California Codes

Cal. Commercial Code § 2309 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1)The time for shipment or delivery or any other action under a contract if not provided in this division or agreed upon shall be a reasonable time.

(2)Where the contract provides for successive performances but is indefinite in duration it is valid for a reasonable time but unless otherwise agreed may be terminated at any time by either party.

(3)Termination of a contract by one party except on the happening of an agreed event requires that reasonable notification be received by the other party and an agreement dispensing with notification is invalid if its operation would be unconscionable.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2022–2025 · leading case: Epicrew USA v. Capital Asset Exch. & Trading, LLC (N.D. Cal. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Soil Retention Prods., Inc. v. Brentwood Indus., Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2022). “” CAL. COM. CODE § 2309(1); see 21 also Apex LLC v.”

Epicrew USA v. Capital Asset Exch. & Trading, LLC (N.D. Cal. 2025). “” Cal. Com. Code § 2309 . Therefore, the Epicrew Contracts 2 contain implied terms that require delivery within a “reasonable time.”

United Prods. & Tech. Ltd. v. Above Edge, LLC (9th Cir. 2025). “” Cal. Com. Code § 2309 (3). The WeChat messages between Fried, Fei Frank Qiu, and Yasmine Hanane do not establish that Qiu notified Defendants of his intent to terminate the contract.”

— Cal. Commercial Code § 2309(1) — 1 case

Soil Retention Prods., Inc. v. Brentwood Indus., Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2022). “” CAL. COM. CODE § 2309(1); see 21 also Apex LLC v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.