Cal. Codes » Labor Code
California Codes

Cal. Labor Code § 514 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 510 and 511 do not apply to an employee covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement if the agreement expressly provides for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of the employees, and if the agreement provides premium wage rates for all overtime hours worked and a regular hourly rate of pay for those employees of not less than 30 percent more than the state minimum wage.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 106 cases (84 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: Carl Curtis v. Irwin Indus., Inc., 913 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Carl Curtis v. Irwin Indus., Inc., 913 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2019). · cites it 3× “§ 185 , because California overtime law does not apply to an employee working under a qualifying collective bargaining agreement, Cal. Lab. Code § 514 , and Curtis worked under such an agreement.”
Rodney Gregory, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Scie, Llc, Dba Epsg Mgmt. Servs., Lp, 317 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 3× “” CAL. LAB. CODE § 514 (emphasis added.) SCIE argues that by reason of Section 514, Section 510 does not apply because the CBA under which Gregory works and is paid provides premium wage rates for overtime.”
David Valles John Breslin, & Members of the Gen. Pub. Similarly Situated v. Ivy Hill Corp., 410 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2005). “134, § 8 (codified at Cal. Lab.Code § 514). However, the Act also authorized the IWC to adopt or amend existing orders relating to meal periods and made clear that the new law was not “intended to restrict the Industrial Welfare Commission in its continuing duties pursuant to…”
Flowers v. Los Angeles Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth., 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1264 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “) Labor Code section 514 exempts from the overtime pay requirements of section 510 any employee covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement that provides “premium wage rates for all overtime hours worked” and a *84 regular hourly rate of pay of not less than 30 percent…”
Vasserman v. Henry Mayo Newhall Mem'l Hosp., 65 F. Supp. 3d 932 (C.D. Cal. 2014). “” Cal. Lab.Code § 514. Section 514 is an affirmative defense that must be pled and proved by Newhall Memorial.”
Hall v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., 146 F. Supp. 3d 1187 (C.D. Cal. 2015). “” Cal. Lab. Code § 514 . The 2015 CBA establishes an alternate workweek in Article X, and provides for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of employees in Article VIII.”
Vranish v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 198 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “Labor Code section 514 1 provides, in relevant part: “Sections 510 and 511 do not apply to an employee covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement if the agreement expressly provides for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of the employees, and if the…”
Burnside v. Kiewit Pac. Corp., 491 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2007). “Cal. Labor Code § 514 . Substantially similar versions of sections 510 and 514 also appear in Wage Order 16-2001.”
Coria v. Recology, Inc., 63 F. Supp. 3d 1093 (N.D. Cal. 2014). “California Labor Code Section 514 provides that “Sections 510 and 511 do not apply to an employee covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement if the agreement expressly provides for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of the employees, and if the agreement…”
Castillo v. Long Beach Mem'l Med. Ctr., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1194 (C.D. Cal. 2015). “Plaintiffs acknowledge that because "Wage Order 5-2001[] provides the same provisions as California Labor Code § 514, the same analysis applies to any claim of exemption under [both].”
Henry Corlew v. Superior Duct Fabrication, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 6× “But California Labor Code § 514 “states that the statutory overtime provisions of § 510 do not apply to an employee who is covered by a valid CBA which expressly provides for the (1) wages, (2) hours of work, (3) working conditions, (4) premium wage rates for all overtime hours,…”
Rodriguez v. USF Reddaway, Inc. (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 6× “) 10 California Labor Code § 514 states: 11 Sections 510 and 511 do not apply to an employee covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement if the agreement expressly provides 12 for the wages, hours of work, and working conditions of the employees, and if the agreement…”
Show all 106 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.