California Codes
Cal. Probate Code § 6450 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Subject to the provisions of this chapter, a relationship of parent and child exists for the purpose of determining intestate succession by, through, or from a person in the following circumstances:
(a)The relationship of parent and child exists between a person and the person’s natural parents, regardless of the marital status of the natural parents.
(b)The relationship of parent and child exists between an adopted person and the person’s adopting parent or parents.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Smith v. Fair Emp. & Hous. Comm'n, 913 P.2d 909 (Cal. 1996).
Smith v. Fair Emp. & Hous. Comm'n, 913 P.2d 909 (Cal. 1996). “Code, §§ 1830, 7602; Prob. Code, § 6450.) Ultimately, the question must be answered as a matter of California law.”
Scott v. Thompson, 184 Cal. App. 4th 1506 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). “” (Prob. Code, § 6450.) Probate Code section 6453 specifies in relevant part: “For the purpose of determining whether a person is a ‘natural parent’ as that term is used in this chapter: [f] (a) A natural parent and child relationship is established where that relationship is…”
In Re Est. of Carter, 4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 490 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003). “” 6 Probate Code section 8110 specifies that an “heir of the decedent” is entitled to personal notice, Probate Code section 6450 states that a “relationship of parent and child” exists for a *1149 person and a person’s “natural parents,” and Probate Code section 6453 says that a…”
Cheyanna M. v. A.C. Nielsen Co., 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7224 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998). “” (Prob. Code, § 6450, subd. (a), italics added.”
Est. of Earnest Chambers v. Money, 175 Cal. App. 4th 891 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “(Prob. Code, § 6450, subds. (a), (b).) Probate Code *895 section 6453 describes how either a parent or child may show whether someone is a natural parent for purposes of intestate succession.”
A.G. v. Cnty. of L. A., 239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 162 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “" ( Prob. Code, § 6450, subd. (a), italics added.”
Lozano v. Scalier, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9169 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996). “(Prob. Code, § 6450.) That is, the distinction between legitimate and illegitimate children has been eliminated.”
Schmidt v. Cnty. of San Diego (S.D. Cal. 2024). “” Cal. Prob. Code § 6450 . “Child” means “any individual entitled to take as a child under this code by intestate 2 succession from the parent whose relationship is involved.”
A.G. v. Cnty. of Los Angeles (Cal. Ct. App. 2018). “also lacks standing under Probate Code section 6450. Next, they return to the argument asserted in the trial court that A.”
Est. of Obata (Cal. Ct. App. 2018). “The sole issue on appeal is whether California law recognizes the Japanese practice called 養子縁組 (yōshi-engumi) as an “adoption” within the meaning of California Probate Code sections 6450 and 6451.”
In re Est. of Fusae Obata, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 545 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “The sole issue on appeal is whether California law recognizes the Japanese practice called (yoshi-engumi) as an "adoption" within the meaning of California Probate Code sections 6450 and 6451.”
Est. of Franco (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “5 Probate Code section 6450 provides that “a relationship of parent and child exists for the purpose of determining intestate succession by, through, or from a person in the following circumstances: [¶] (a) The relationship of parent and child exists between a person and the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.