California Codes

Cal. Vehicle Code § 40230 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Within 30 calendar days after the mailing or personal delivery of the final decision described in subdivision (b) of Section 40215, the contestant may seek review by filing an appeal to be heard by the superior court where the same shall be heard de novo, except that the contents of the processing agency’s file in the case shall be received in evidence. A copy of the notice of parking violation or, if the citation was issued electronically, a true and correct abstract containing the information set forth in the notice of parking violation shall be admitted into evidence as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. A copy of the notice of appeal shall be served in person or by first-class mail upon the processing agency by the contestant. For purposes of computing the 30-calendar-day period, Section 1013 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be applicable. A proceeding under this subdivision is a limited civil case.

(b)The fee for filing the notice of appeal is as provided in Section 70615 of the Government Code. The court shall request that the processing agency’s file on the case be forwarded to the court, to be received within 15 calendar days of the request. The court shall notify the contestant of the appearance date by mail or personal delivery. The court shall retain the fee under Section 70615 of the Government Code regardless of the outcome of the appeal. If the court finds in favor of the contestant, the amount of the fee shall be reimbursed to the contestant by the processing agency. Any deposit of parking penalty shall be refunded by the processing agency in accordance with the judgment of the court.

(c)The conduct of the appeal under this section is a subordinate judicial duty that may be performed by traffic trial commissioners and other subordinate judicial officials at the direction of the presiding judge of the court.

(d)If no notice of appeal of the processing agency’s decision is filed within the period set forth in subdivision (a), the decision shall be deemed final.

(e)If the parking penalty has not been deposited and the decision is against the contestant, the processing agency shall, after the decision becomes final, proceed to collect the penalty pursuant to Section 40220.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2016 · leading case: Gillespie v. City of Northampton, 460 Mass. 148 (Mass. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gillespie v. City of Northampton, 460 Mass. 148 (Mass. 2011). “Gov’t Code § 70615 (West 2009) and Cal. Veh. Code § 40230 (West 2000) (filing fee of twenty-five dollars for court review of administrative adjudication); Conn.”

Lagos v. City of Oakland, 41 Cal. App. Supp. 4th 10 (Cal. App. Dep’t Super. Ct. 1995). · cites it 2× “” (Veh. Code, § 40230, subd. (a).) No express provision is made for further appeal to the appellate department.”

Castaneda v. City of Whittier CA2/7 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “” (Veh. Code, § 40230, subd. (a).) If no such notice of appeal is filed within the time limit, “the decision shall be deemed final.”

Untitled California Attorney Gen. Opinion (Cal. Att'y Gen. 1994). “(Veh. Code, § 40230.) In light of the foregoing characteristics of the legislation in question, we find that it addresses a matter of statewide concern, is reasonably related to the resolution of such concern, and is narrowly tailored to limit incursion into legitimate municipal…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.