Royal Indem. v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736 (1937). · Go Syfert
Royal Indem. v. Cardillo, 302 U.S. 736 (1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc. (ca7, 1971-07-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1937 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1937 1981 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
E.g., Bela Seating Company, Inc. v. Poloron Products, Inc., 438 F.2d 733 (7 Cir. No. 17444, January 25, 1971); Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc., 318 F.Supp. 1116, 1140 (S.D.N.Y.1970); Faulkner v. Gibbs, 199 F.2d 635, 639 (9 Cir. 1952); see Activated Sludge, Inc. v. Sanitary District of Chicago, 64 F.Supp. 25, 33 (N.D.Ill.1946), aff'd per curiam, 157 F.2d 517 (7 Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 736 , 58 S.Ct. 121 , 82 L.Ed. 569 (1946). 72 In the Bela Seating case, an alleged infringer asserted the right to a license under a patent in suit for the same royal…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Royal Indemnity Company, a Corporation
v.
Frank A. Cardillo, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.
411.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 25, 1937.
302 U.S. 736
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

302 U.S. 736

58 S.Ct. 122

82 L.Ed. 569

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners,
v.
Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.[*]

No. 411.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 25, 1937

Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

1

Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

2

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

3

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

4

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S.Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.