green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Zucconi
Further, Miranda does not apply to noncustodial interrogations; the rules of that case are applicable only “when an individual is taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom by the authorities * * 384 *364 U. S., at p. 478, 86 S. Ct., at p. 1630, 16 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pekao Trading Corp.
v.
George M. Bragalini
v.
George M. Bragalini
483.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1960.
Arthur C. Fink for appellant.
Douglas, Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U. S. 450.
Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.