Seals v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 254 (1965).

Seals v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 254 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.6 score

19 citation events across 9 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 19

Treatment by court

ala	0R/0Y/0G	4
alacrimapp	0R/0Y/0G	2
alactapp	0R/0Y/0G	2
ca10	0R/0Y/0G	2
cod	0R/0Y/0G	2
mich	0R/0Y/0G	2
pa	0R/0Y/0G	2
txwd	0R/0Y/0G	2
texcrimapp	0R/0Y/0G	1

Frequently cited alongside

#1	green	Griffin	co-cited 4×
#2	neutral	Seals	co-cited 4×

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Seals
v.
Alabama

465, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Mar 8, 1965.

380 U.S. 254

85 S. Ct. 943

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Vernon Crawford, Morton Stavis, Martin R. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Kinoy and William M. Kunstler for petitioner., Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Cited by 6 opinions | Published

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The Court is of the view that on the record the petitioner is an indigent. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12.