Senfour Inv. Co., Inc. v. King Cnty., 385 U.S. 1 (1966). · Go Syfert
Senfour Inv. Co., Inc. v. King Cnty., 385 U.S. 1 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cook v. Schriro (ca9, 2008-02-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cook v. Schriro
9th Cir. · 2008 · confidence medium
See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 153 (1972) (witness and the prosecutor stated that there was no plea deal when there was a lenient plea agreement); Miller v. Pate, 385 U.S. 1, 3-4, 6 (1967) (prosecutor had expert testify that substance on defendant’s shorts was blood when it was paint); Alcorta v. Texas, 355 U.S. 28, 30-32 (1957) (per curiam) (prosecutor told witness not to volun- teer that he had a sexual relationship with the defendant’s wife and witness testified he was not sexually involved with the wife).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Senfour Investment Co., Inc.
v.
King County
93.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
385 U.S. 1
Jerome M. Johnson for appellant., James E. Kennedy and William L. Paul, Jr., for appellee., Solicitor General Marshall and Philip A. Loomis, Jr., for the United States, as amicus curiae,,
Per Curiam.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.