Radich v. New York, 401 U.S. 531 (1971). · Go Syfert
Radich v. New York, 401 U.S. 531 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
137 citation events across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Delorme v. State (texcrimapp, 1973-01-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Delorme v. State (6×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Radich, 26 N.Y.2d 114 , 308 N.Y.S.2d 846 , 257 N.E.2d 30 (1970), affirmed, Radich v. New York, 401 U.S. 531 , 91 S.Ct. 1217 , 28 L.Ed.2d 287 (1971); People v. Cowgill, 274 Cal.App.2d Supp. 923 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 853 (1969), appeal dismissed, Cowgill v. California, 396 U.S. 371 , 90 S.Ct. 613 , 24 L.Ed.2d 590 (1970); and State v. Waterman, 190 N.W.2d 809 (Iowa, 1971).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Carney
pactcompldauphi · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Radich v. New York, 401 U.S. 531 .
examined Cited "see" Thoms v. Smith (12×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D. Conn. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See the dissents of Chief Justice Warren and Justices Black, White and Fortas in Street , and see People v. Radich, 26 N. Y.2d 114, 308 N.Y.S.2d 846 , 257 N.E.2d 30 (Ct.App.1970) aff’d per curiam by an equally divided court, 401 U.S. 531 , 91 S.Ct. 1217 , 28 L.Ed.2d 287 (1971); Sutherland v. DeWulf, 323 F.Supp. 740 (S.D.Ill.N.D.1971); State of Iowa v. Waterman, 190 N.W.2d 809 (Sup.Ct.
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States Ex Rel. Radich v. Criminal Ct. of NY (6×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Brief for Appellant in Radich v. New York, 401 U.S. 531 , 91 S.Ct. 1217 , 28 L.Ed.2d 287 (1971), at 3-4. 21 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RADICH
v.
NEW YORK.
169.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1971.
401 U.S. 531
Per Curiam.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Richard G. Green argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Shirley Fingerhood and Melvin L. Wulf.

Michael R. Juviler argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Frank S. Hogan and William C. Donnino.

John B. Hightower et al. filed a brief as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief for the Attorney General of New York as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.