Staats v. Bristol Labs. Div. of Bristol-Myers Co., 451 U.S. 400 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Staats v. Bristol Labs. Div. of Bristol-Myers Co., 451 U.S. 400 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Savastano (or, 2013-09-12) · Strongest negative: Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (ca7, 1981-06-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Bristol Laboratories Div. v. Staats, 620 F.2d 17 (2nd Cir. 1980), affirmed by an equally divided Court, 451 U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 2037 , 68 L.Ed.2d 343 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Savastano
Or. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Klamath Falls v. Winters, 289 Or 757 , 769-70 n 10, 619 P2d 217 (1980), appeal dismissed, 451 US 964 , 101 S Ct 2037 , 68 L Ed 2d 343 (1981) (explaining that “[t]his court has consistently held that the scope of these two provisions is the same”).
examined Cited "see" United States v. John Pimentel and Duroyd Manufacturing Co., Inc. (3×)
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bristol Laboratories Division of Bristol-Myers Co. v. Staats, 428 F.Supp. 1388, 1391 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd on opinion below, 620 F.2d 17 (2d Cir.1980), aff'd by equally divided court, 451 U.S. 400 , 101 S.Ct. 2037 , 68 L.Ed.2d 184 (1981); 10 U.S.C. §§ 2306 (f)(1), (3) and 2313(a)(1), (b).
cited Cited "see" Sanders v. United States National Bank
Or. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Klamath Falls v. Winters, 289 Or. 757 , 619 P.2d 217 (1980), appeal dismissed 451 U.S. 964 , 101 S.Ct. 2037 , 68 L.Ed.2d 343 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Bowsher v. Merck & Co. (2×)
SCOTUS · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bristol Laboratories Division of Bristol-Myers Co. v. Staats, 428 F. Supp. 1388 (SDNY 1977), aff’d, 620 F. 2d 17 (CA2 1980), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 451 U. S. 400 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Staats v. Bristol Laboratories Division of Bristol-Myers Co., 428 F.Supp. 1388 (S.D.N.Y.1977), 620 F.2d 17 (2d Cir. 1980), aff'd by evenly divided court, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 2037 , 68 L.Ed.2d 343 (1981); SmithKline Corp. v. Staats, 483 F.Supp. 712 (E.D.Pa.1980), appeal pending No. 80-1464 (3d Cir. Mar. 19, 1980), conditional petition for certiorari before judgment denied December 8, 1980, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 619 , 66 L.Ed.2d 502 (1980); Eli Lilly & Co. v. Staats, 574 F.2d 904 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 959 , 99 S.Ct. 362 , 58 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978); United States v. Abb…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STAATS, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
v.
BRISTOL LABORATORIES DIVISION OF BRISTOL-MYERS CO.
80-264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1981.
451 U.S. 400
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Mark I. Levy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Acting Assistant Attorney General Martin, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, Michael Kimmel, Robert Kaplan, and Milton J. Socolar.

Gilbert H. Weil argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Sherman.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[*] Philip Lacovara, Ronald A. Stern, Stanley L. Temko, Charles Lister, and Clare Dalton filed a brief for Merck & Co., Inc., et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.