Davis v. Goodson, 459 U.S. 1154 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Goodson, 459 U.S. 1154 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
66 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jones v. Gibson (ca10, 2000-02-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jones v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. State, 648 P.2d 1251 (Okla.Crim.App.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Bryson v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. State, 648 P.2d 1251 (Okl.Cr. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983). [7] Further, the evidence does not show that co-defendant Plantz was in any "imminent danger of death or great bodily harm" to support an instruction on defense of another.
cited Cited "see" Trice v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. State, 648 P.2d 1251 (Okl.Cr.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Whitehead
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Mikenas v. State, 460 So.2d 359 (Fla.1984); Demps v. State, 416 So.2d 808 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 209 , 98 L.Ed.2d 160 (1987); see Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673, 675 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).
cited Cited "see" Dobbert v. Wainwright
M.D. Fla. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980), aff'd, 418 So.2d 987 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983); Adams v. State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla.1980).
cited Cited "see" Hall v. Wainwright
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980), aff'd, 418 So.2d 987 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983); Adams v. State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla.1980).
cited Cited "see" Hall v. Wainwright
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980), aff'd, 418 So.2d 987 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983); Ad ams v. State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla.1980).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. State
Fla. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Jones v. State, 648 P.2d 1251, 1258 (Okl.Cr.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1155 , 103 S.Ct. 799 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James E. Davis
v.
John W. Goodson
82-490.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1983.
459 U.S. 1154
Stevens, Marshall.
Cited by 53 opinions  |  Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 56%
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice STEVENS, concurring in the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.

Because the petition for a writ of certiorari does not affirmatively show that a federal question was presented to or decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas, I believe the Court correctly denies the writ.

Justice MARSHALL, dissenting.

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certio-rari denied.

Concurrence

Justice Stevens,

concurring.

Because the petition for a writ of certiorari does not affirmatively show that a federal question was presented to or decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas, I believe the Court correctly denies the writ.

Dissent

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Petitioner was summarily held in contempt for advising his client that he had a privilege not to submit to a breath-analysis test. In citing petitioner for contempt, the judge made no finding that the advice was given in bad faith. Given the absence of such a finding, I would grant certiorari to decide whether petitioner’s conviction and sentence for contempt[*1155] are constitutionally infirm in light of this Court’s decision in Maness v. Meyers, 419 U. S. 449 (1975), where we held that “an advocate is not subject to the penalty of contempt for advising his client, in good faith, to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in any proceeding embracing the power to compel testimony.” Id., at 468. See also id., at 472 (Stewart, J., concurring in result); In re Watts, 190 U. S. 1, 29 (1903) (“if an attorney acts in good faith and in the honest belief that his advice is well founded and in the just interests of his client, he cannot be held liable for error in judgment”).