Missouri v. Erwin, 510 U.S. 826 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Missouri v. Erwin, 510 U.S. 826 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
129 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Marchiano v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc. (dcd, 2001-02-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Marchiano v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.
D.D.C. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ukiah Adventist Hosp. v. F.T.C., 981 F.2d 543, 549 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 825 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 55 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Hill v. United States
E.D. Wis. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roehl v. United States, 977 F.2d 375, 378 (7th Cir.1992) (“As provided in Wis. Stat. § 57.078 , the authorities issue a certificate to a person who has satisfied his sentence.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 825 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993); see also Dahler, 143 F.3d at 1086 (7th Cir.1998) (noting that Wisconsin issued a discharge certificate to defendant when he was released from his conviction), ce rt. denied, 525 U.S. 1090 , 119 S.Ct. 844 , 142 L.Ed.2d 698 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Roberts v. Bowersox
E.D. Mo. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Erwin, 848 S.W.2d 476, 482 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 826 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993); see also § 562.076 R.S.Mo.
cited Cited "see" Richard E. Melvin v. United States
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roehl v. United States, 977 F.2d 375, 377 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Anthony E. Jiminez v. Mary Washington College Philip Hall, Anthony E. Jiminez v. Mary Washington College Philip Hall
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 538 (3d Cir.1992) (stating that “when the evidence sheds light on whether the employer treated similarly situated males and females alike, it should not be ignored”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Filemon Arzate-Nunez
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Roehl v. United States, 977 F.2d 375, 377-378 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993); Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916 ; 921 (1st Cir.1942), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1431 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 (1943).
cited Cited "see" Solt v. Alpo Petfoods, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (U.S.1993).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hunter v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
D.D.C. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also Ukiah Adventist Hospital v. FTC, 981 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied 510 U.S. 825 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 55 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Beatty v. Farmer
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2004 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 533 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 826 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993) (reversing district court’s holding that questioned the wisdom of a law firm’s partnership standards which considered legal analysis a critical category of performance review).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Dennis J. Williams
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. McKinley, 23 F.3d 181, 183 (7th Cir.1994); see also Roehl v. United States, 977 F.2d 375, 377 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 825 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993) (holding civil rights not restored for purposes of § 921(a)(20) because Wisconsin law prohibits felons from holding public office); United States v. Erwin, 902 F.2d 510, 512 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 859 , 111 S.Ct. 161 , 112 L.Ed.2d 127 (1990) (holding civil rights not restored for purposes of § 921 (a) (20) because Illinois law prohibits convicted felons from owning guns and still c…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Horth v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.
M.D. Penn. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 542-43 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 826 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques Amblard
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fuentes, 32 F.3d at 764-65 (“[T]he non-moving plaintiff must demonstrate such weaknesses, implausibilities, inconsistencies, incoherencies, or contradictions in the employer’s proffered legitimate reasons for its action that a-reasonable factfinder could rationally find them ‘unworthy of credence ....’” (quoting Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 531 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 826 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993))).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co.
W.D. Pa. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 523 (3d Cir.l992)(be-cause the prima facie is easily made out, it is rarely the focus of the ultimate disagreement) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 826 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Antol v. Sec Dept Defense
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
This is not a case where the person making the statement "was outside the chain of decision-makers who had the authority to hire and fire plaintiff." Gomez v. Allegheny Health Services, Inc., 71 F.3d 1079, 1085 (3d Cir. 1995); see also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 546-47 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 88 (1993) (six comments made over the five years before decision at issue by individual not working for employer at time of decision too remote to show independently that unlawful discrimination more likely than proffered reason).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kenneth C. Antol v. William J. Perry, Secretary Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency) (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
This is not a case where the person making the statement “was outside the chain of decision-makers who had the authority to hire and fire plaintiff.” Gomez v. Allegheny Health Services, Inc., 71 F.3d 1079, 1085 (3d Cir.1995); see also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 546-47 (3d Cir.1992) (six comments made over the five years before decision at issue by individual not working for employer at time of decision was too remote to show independently that unlawful discrimination more likely than proffered reason), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Armbruster v. Erie Civic Center Authority
W.D. Pa. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 523 (3d Cir.1992) (because the prima facie case is easily made out, it is rarely the focus of the ultimate disagreement) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 826 , 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993); Turner v. Schering-Plough Corp., 901 F.2d 335, 342 (3d Cir.1990) (prima facie test' requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that he "was qualified by training and experience for the job from which he was discharged”). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Torre v. Federated Mutual Insurance
D. Kan. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 546 (3rd Cir.1992) ((recognizing that “proof of a discriminatory atmosphere may be relevant in proving pretext"), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993); Parker v. Secretary, United States Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, 891 F.2d 316, 322 (D.C.Cir.1989)(noting that proof of a discriminatory atmosphere could be relevant in proving individualized discrimination); Conway v. Electro Switch Corp., 825 F.2d 593, 597 (1st Cir.1987)(explaining that “[wjhile evidence of a discriminatory atmosphere…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp.
W.D. Pa. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
(Def.Mem. in Support at 25-27.) Although the standard in this Circuit is not entirely clear as to what a plaintiff must show in order to demonstrate the prima facie element of qualification, this Circuit has observed that “the burden of making out a prima facie ease is not onerous.” Fowle v. C & C Cola, A Div. of ITT-Continental Baking Co., 868 F.2d 59, 65 (3d Cir.1989) (citing Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. at 253 , 101 S.Ct. at 1093-94 ; see also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 523 (3d Cir.1992) (because the prima facie case is easily …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chestnut Hill Hospital
E.D. Pa. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802 , 93 S.Ct. at 1824 ; see also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 522 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Maidenbaum v. Bally's Park Place, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mwy’s, — U.S. at-, 113 S.Ct. at 2747; see also Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, 983 F.2d 509, 522 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 88 , 126 L.Ed.2d 56 (1993); Chipollini, 814 F.2d at 898 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Missouri
v.
Erwin
92-2009.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 826
Published

510 U.S. 826

Missouri
v.
Erwin.

No. 92-2009.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Mo.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 848 S. W. 2d 476.