green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Colón-Díaz v. United States
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 554 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 850 , 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993) (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 554 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 850 , 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993) (citing Schneckloth, 412 U.S. at 218 , 93 S.Ct. at 2041 ).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnett
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 148 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tuesta Toro
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.) (“The Constitution entitles a criminal defendant to a fair trial, not a perfect one.”) (citing Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 681 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1436 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brandon
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 148 (1993); United States v. Steffen, 641 F.2d 591, 598 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 943 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brandon
See United States v. Barnett, 989 ___ _____________ _______ F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 148 (1993); ____ ______ United States v. Steffen, 641 F.2d 591, 598 (8th Cir.), cert. _____________ _______ ____ denied, 452 U.S. 943 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brandon
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993); United States v. Steffen, 641 F.2d 591, 598 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 943 , 101 S.Ct. 3091 , 69 L.Ed.2d 959 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Brandon, United States of America v. Charles D. Gauvin, United States of America v. Marvin Granoff, United States of America v. Ronald R. Hagopian, United States of America v. Momi A. Kumalae, United States of America v. Owen B. Landman, United States of America v. Norman D. Reisch, United States of America v. John Ward
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993); United States v. Steffen, 641 F.2d 591, 598 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 943 , 101 S.Ct. 3091 , 69 L.Ed.2d 959 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 559 (1st Cir.), cert. ___ _____________ _______ _____ denied, 114 S. Ct. 148 (1993); United States v. Martinez, 922 ______ ______________ ________ F.2d 914, 922 (1st Cir. 1991) (noting that "'prejudice means more than just a better chance of acquittal at a separate trial'") (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 559 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 149, 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993); United States v. Martinez, 922 F.2d 914, 922 (1st Cir.1991) (noting that “‘prejudice means more than just a better chance of acquittal at a separate trial’ ”) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore Robinson, Sr.
(2×)
Cf. United States v. Olson, 21 F.3d 847, 849 (8th Cir.) ("We find that there was sufficient evidence, independent of the information obtained through the use of the FLIR device, to support a finding of probable cause."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 230 , 130 L.Ed.2d 155 (1994); United States v. Deaner, 1 F.3d 192, 197 (3d Cir.1993) (holding that, even without the FLIR surveillance evidence, the rest of the factual information in the affidavit would have supported probable cause for issuance of the search warrant to determine if marijuana was being cultivated in a private residence);…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. De Masi
See id. (rejecting cumulative ___ ___ error argument); see also United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d ___ ____ _____________ _______ 546, 560 (1st Cir.) ("The Constitution entitles a criminal defendant to a fair trial, not a perfect one." (quotations -39- 39 omitted)), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 148 , and cert. denied, _____ ______ ___ _____ ______ 114 S. Ct. 149 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DeMasi
See id. (rejecting cumulative error argument); see also United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.) (“The Constitution entitles a criminal defendant to a fair trial, not a perfect one.” (quotations omitted)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 , and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 149 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. De Masi
See id. (rejecting cumulative error argument); see also United States v. Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 560 (1st Cir.) ("The Constitution entitles a criminal defendant to a fair trial, not a perfect one." (quotations omitted)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 , and cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 149 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres Maldonado
See also United States v. Williams, 985 F.2d 749 , 756 ___ ____ _____________ ________ (5th Cir.) ("Because the evidence does not support an inference that [nonpossessing defendants] knew the gun was available to [possessing codefendant], the evidence is insufficient to support [nonpossessing defendants'] convictions on [a section 924(c)(1)] count."), cert. denied, _____ ______ 114 S. Ct. 148 (1993); United States v. Nelson, 733 F.2d 364 , _____________ ______ 371 (5th Cir.) ("[W]e believe that in order to convict [defendant] on the theory that [coconspirator] aided and abetted [defendant], th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres Maldonado
See also United States v. Williams, 985 F.2d 749, 756 (5th Cir.) (“Because the evidence does not support an inference that [nonpossessing defendants] knew the gun was available to [possessing code-fendant], the evidence is insufficient to support [nonpossessing defendants’] convictions on [a section 924(c)(1)] count.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 148 , 126 L.Ed.2d 110 (1993); United States v. Nelson, 733 F.2d 364, 371 (5th Cir.) (“[W]e believe that in order to convict [defendant] on the theory that [eoconspirator] aided and abetted [defendant], the government had to prove that […
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jorgensen
v.
Washington
v.
Washington
92-9085.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Jorgensen
v.
Washington.
No. 92-9085.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the Ct. App. Wash.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Wash. App. 572, 837 P. 2d 1037.