green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…the purpose of this deadline is to 'enable a debtor and his creditors to know, reasonably promptly, what parties are making claims against the estate and in what general amounts.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Prevatte
But see State v. Ballard, 333 N.C. 515, 519 , 428 S.E.2d 178, 180 (ex parte hearing was needed for motion requesting assistance of psychiatric expert because this issue was “one of an intensely sensitive, personal nature”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 984 , 126 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Spenlinhauer
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the purpose of this deadline is to 'enable a debtor and his creditors to know, reasonably promptly, what parties are making claims against the estate and in what general amounts.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Spenlinhauer
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the purpose of this deadline is to 'enable a debtor and his creditors to know, reasonably promptly, what parties are making claims against the estate and in what general amounts.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Witaschek v. Sacramento County Bureau of Family Support (In Re Witaschek)
however, like any other holder of a nondischargeable debt, the irs is also free to pursue the debtor outside bankruptcy.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beck v. Angelone
Exhaustion requires a fair presentment of each individual claim to the highest court in the state with jurisdiction to hear the claim, that is, in this case, the Supreme Court of Virginia. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (c); see Pruett v. Thompson, 771 F.Supp. 1428, 1436 (E.D.Va.1991), aff'd 996 F.2d 1560 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 510 U.S. 984 , 114 S.Ct. 487 , 126 L.Ed.2d 437 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moseley v. French
See Roach v. Martin, 757 F.2d 1463 , 1470 & n. 6 (4th Cir.1985).” Pruett v. Thompson, 771 F.Supp. 1428, 1458 (E.D.Va.1991), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1560 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 984 , 114 S.Ct. 487 , 126 L.Ed.2d 437 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
North Carolina
v.
Ballard; And North Carolina v. Bates
v.
Ballard; And North Carolina v. Bates
93-143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (2) · N.D. Oklahoma (1)
Sup. Ct. N. C. Motions of respondents Lonnie Ballard and Joseph Earl Bates for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.