discussed Cited "see" United States v. Amanda Mitchell, AKA Amanda Foster, Amanda Mitchell See United States v. De La Cruz, 996 F.2d 1307, 1311 (1st Cir.) (noting that government, in cross-examining witness, could produce testimony that would inculpate him “not merely in the instant transaction but in other [drug] transactions”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 986 , 114 S.Ct. 356 , 126 L.Ed.2d 320 (1993); United States v. Mathews, 997 F.2d 848 , 851 n. 4 (11th Cir.) (stating that “convicted, but not yet sentenced, defendant risks ... additional prosecutions for related conduct”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1029 , 114 S.Ct. 647 , 126 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); United States v. Bahadar, 954 F.2d…