Alvarez v. United States, 510 U.S. 1074 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Alvarez v. United States, 510 U.S. 1074 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. Tart (ncwd, 1997-02-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. Tart
W.D.N.C. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
STANDARD OF REVIEW The Court reviews de novo those portions of the Memorandum and Recommendation to which objections have been filed, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C); United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 , 100 S.Ct. 2406 , 65 L.Ed.2d 424 , reh’g denied, 448 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 36 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1980), and gives careful review to un-objected portions for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A); see Peck v. Tegtmeyer, 834 F.Supp. 903 (W.D.Va.1992), aff'd, 4 F.3d 985 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1074 , 114 S.Ct. 884 , 127 L.Ed.2d 79 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Michael J. (2×)
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id., 673 ; see also United States v. Botello, 991 F.2d 189, 192 (5th Cir. 1993) (“[a] motion by the defendant for mistrial is ordinarily assumed to remove any barrier to reprosecution, even if the defendant’s motion is necessitated by prosecutorial or judicial error” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1074 , 114 S. Ct. 886 , 127 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
7th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
The application note further explains that, “[i]n the case of criminal activity undertaken in concert with others, whether or not charged as a conspiracy, the conduct for which the defendant ‘would be otherwise accountable’ also includes conduct of others in furtherance of the execution of the jointly-under *851 taken criminal activity that was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant.” U.S.S.G. § IB 1.3, n. 1; see also United States v. Flores, 5 F.3d 1070, 1083 (7th Cir.1993) (“Reasonable foreseeability refers to the scope of the agreement that [the defendant] entered into when he j…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alvarez
v.
United States
93-885.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1994.
510 U.S. 1074
Published

510 U.S. 1074

Alvarez
v.
United States.

No. 93-885.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 18, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 996 F. 2d 1228.