McCullough v. Williams, 510 U.S. 1199 (1994). · Go Syfert
McCullough v. Williams, 510 U.S. 1199 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Valdez-Herrera (ca10, 1996-09-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Valdez-Herrera
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947, 950 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1311 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn A. DUMAS, Defendant-Appellant (2×)
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947, 952 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1311 , 127 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); United States v. Byse, 28 F.3d 1165 , 1170 n. 8 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 767 , 130 L.Ed.2d 663 (1995); Johnson, 40 F.3d at 441 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Adrian Arnett Williams, Also Known as A-Bone, Also Known as A.K., United States of America v. Katrina Hayes
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947, 953 (10th Cir.1993) (“[R]easons exist, other than race, for enhanced penalties for cocaine base offenses_”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1311 , 127 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); United States v. Angulo-Lopez, 7 F.3d 1506, 1509 (10th Cir.1993) (“Congress ... had rational justification in creating the sentencing disparity.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1563 , 128 L.Ed.2d 209 (1994); United States v. Easter, 981 F.2d 1549, 1558-59 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2448 , 124 L.Ed.2d 665 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sean Ashley
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947 (10th Cir.1993) (enhanced penalty scheme for one distributing cocaine base, as opposed to cocaine powder, did not violate due process and was not enacted for a discriminatory purpose), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1311 , 127 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); United States v. Turner, 928 F.2d 956 (10th Cir.) (sentencing guidelines that treat one gram of cocaine base as equivalent to 100 grams of cocaine powder does not violate due process), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 230 , 116 L.Ed.2d 187 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Moore
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare id. (defining a selective prosecution claim) and Furman, 31 F.3d at 1037 (stating the elements of a selective prosecution claim) with United States v. Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947, 951-52 (10th Cir.1993) (holding that the defendant's statistical evidence was "insufficient to establish that 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1) and U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 are unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause"), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1311 (1994) and United States v. Easter, 981 F.2d 1549 , 1559 (10th Cir.1992) (holding that the defendant "presented no evidence that either Congress or the Sentencing Commission ad…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marvin Byse
11th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Thurmond, 7 F.3d 947, 950-53 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1311 , 127 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); United States v. Reece, 994 F.2d 277, 278-79 (6th Cir.1993) (per curiam); United States v. Frazier, 981 F.2d 92, 95 (3d Cir.1992) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1662 , 123 L.Ed.2d 279 , and cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1661 , 123 L.Ed.2d 281 (1993); United States v. Willis, 967 F.2d 1220, 1225 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Galloway, 951 F.2d 64, 65-66 (5th Cir.1992) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCullough
v.
Williams
93-7485.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
510 U.S. 1199
Published

510 U.S. 1199

McCullough
v.
Williams et al.

No. 93-7485.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 21, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied.