green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gary William Holt v. W. Jeff Reynolds
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Nor is such a liberty interest created merely because state law recognizes the doctrine of equitable estoppel. 10 An alleged error in state law is only remediable on a petition of habeas corpus "when [it] rises to the level of depriving the defendant of fundamental fairness in the trial process." Id. at 1354.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Henry Glover v. John Littlefield, Warden
Id. at 1355-56; Angel v. Overberg, 682 F.2d 605, 608 (6th Cir.1982) (en banc) (identifying factors to consider in weighing extent of prosecutorial misconduct in habeas cases).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Almany
See Serra v. Mich. Dep. of Corrections, 4 F.3d 1348, 1352 (6th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1201 , 114 S.Ct. 1317 , 127 L.Ed.2d 666 (1994) (citing Wheat, 486 U.S. at 157 , 108 S.Ct. 1692 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul W. Schaff v. Donald Snyder
See People v. Schaff, 152 Ill.2d 575 , 190 Ill.Dec. 906 , 622 N.E.2d 1223 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1201 , 114 S.Ct. 1317 , 127 L.Ed.2d 667 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Sam Reed Scruggs v. United States
See Serra v. Michigan Dep't of Corrections, 4 F.3d 1348, 1355 (6th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1317 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawson v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
See also, Serra v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 4 F.3d 1348, 1354 (6th Cir.1993) (indicating that, when prose-cutorial misconduct “rises to the level of depriving the defendant of fundamental fairness in the trial process, the claim is remediable on a petition for habeas corpus relief’), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1201 , 114 S.Ct. 1317 , 127 L.Ed.2d 666 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Anderson
See also Serra v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 4 F.3d 1348, 1354 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1201 , 114 S.Ct. 1317 , 127 L.Ed.2d 666 (When prosecutorial misconduct “rises to the level of depriving the defendant of fundamental fairness in the trial process, the claim is remediable on a petition for habeas corpus relief.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patsy Mays (94-6473) and Samuel W. Mays (94-6480)
See, e.g., Serra v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 4 F.3d 1348 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1317 , 127 L.Ed.2d 666 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenny K. Hatfield v. Hon. Hunter Daugherty and Hon. Chris Gorman
See also Serra v. Michigan Dep't of Corrections, 4 F.3d 1348, 1354 (6th Cir.1993) ("While it is true that habeas relief cannot be granted simply 'on the basis of a perceived error of state law,' ... when an error rises to the level of depriving the defendant of fundamental fairness in the trial process, the claim is remediable on a petition for habeas corpus relief."), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1317 (1994); Olsen v. McFaul, 843 F.2d 918, 929 (6th Cir.1988) ("The violation of a state statute or rule of practice does not, by itself, constitute deprivation of a right guaranteed by the Constitution …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schaff
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
93-7642.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Schaff
v.
Illinois.
No. 93-7642.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 21, 1994.
1
Appeal from the App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 Ill. App. 3d 547, 618 N. E. 2d 566.