green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hernan Navarro v. Bureau of Corrections
See Navarro v. United States, 535 U.S. 926 , 122 S. Ct. 1376 , 152 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Correll v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
Accord Johnson v. Alabama, 256 F.3d 1156, 1172 (11th Cir. 2001) (“Although each element of the offense must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, ... the State is not required to rule out every hypothesis except that of the .guilt of the defendant.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied sub nom, Johnson v. Nagle, 535 U.S. 926 , 122 S.Ct. 1295 , 152 L.Ed.2d 208 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cotton v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Photogrammetric Data Services, Inc., 259 F.3d 229 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 926 , 122 S.Ct. 1295 , 152 L.Ed.2d 208 (2002), abrogated on other grounds by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) (detention of employees while business office searched pursuant to warrant permissible under Summers); Ganwich v. Knapp, 319 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2003) (same); United States v. Cavazos, 288 F.3d 706 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 910 , 123 S.Ct. 253 , 154 L.Ed.2d 189 (2002); State v. Vorburger, 255 Wis.2d 537 , 648 N.W.2d 829 …
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Charleston v. Masi
See Curtis v. State, 345 S.C. 557 , 549 S.E.2d 591 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 926 , 122 S.Ct. 1295 , 152 L.Ed.2d 208 (2002) (case becomes moot when judgment, if rendered, will have no practical legal effect upon existing controversy); Waters v. South Carolina Land Resources Conservation Comm’n, 321 S.C. 219 , 467 S.E.2d 913 (1996) (justiciable controversy is real and substantial controversy appropriate for judicial determination, as opposed to dispute or difference of contingent, hypothetical or abstract character).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reynolds
For purposes of Miranda , a person is “in custody” if, under the totality of the circumstances, his “freedom of ac *913 tion is curtailed to a degree associated with formal arrest.” Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 440 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984) (internal quotations omitted); accord United States v. Photogrammetric Data Serv., Inc. 259 F.3d 229, 240-42 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 926 , 122 S.Ct. 1295 , 152 L.Ed.2d 208 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Loutos
See United States v. Driver, 242 F.3d 767, 769 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 926 , 122 S.Ct. 1294 , 152 L.Ed.2d 207 (2002) (“A [Rule 11] violation would be harmless when the defendant already knew the information omitted by the judge — when, for example, his own lawyer had told him about cross-examination, or the written plea agreement had specified the maximum possible punishment.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SCDSS v. Shawna O.
This is true when some event occurs making it impossible for [the] reviewing Court to grant effectual relief. Collins Music Co. v. IGT , 365 S.C. 544, 549 , 619 S.E.2d 1, 3 (Ct. App. 2005); see also Curtis v. State , 345 S.C. 557 , 549 S.E.2d 591 (2001), 535 U.S. 926 (2002) (stating a case becomes moot when a decision, if rendered, will have no practical legal effect upon the controversy); Waters v. S.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Johnson
v.
Nagle, Warden
v.
Nagle, Warden
01-885.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
535 U.S. 926
Published
JOHNSON
v.
NAGLE, WARDEN, ET AL.
No. 01-885.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 18, 2002.
1
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 256 F. 3d 1156.