Eqbal v. United States, 535 U.S. 932 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Eqbal v. United States, 535 U.S. 932 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Whitlatch v. Senkowski (nywd, 2004-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Whitlatch v. Senkowski
W.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
In deciding whether a penalty is grossly disproportionate to the offense, the Supreme Court has indicated that a court should consider “(i) the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty; (ii) the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction; and (iii) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.” Solem, 463 U.S. at 292 , 103 S.Ct. 3001 ; accord United States v. Bennett, 252 F.3d 559, 567 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 932 , 122 S.Ct. 1307 , 152 L.Ed.2d 217 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" John Charles Middleton v. J.E. McDonald Clinton County Sheriff's Department
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kellogg v. Strack, 269 F.3d 100, 104 (2d Cir.2001) (holding that a 26-month delay was “a period of time which constitutes a patently unreasonable delay absent mitigating circumstances”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 932 , 122 S.Ct. 1306 , 152 L.Ed.2d 216 (2002); Watkins, 169 F.3d at 544 (expressing “considerable trepidation” about whether a 17-month delay was reasonable, but ultimately finding that the issue was not properly before the court); Nucor Corp. v. Neb.
discussed Cited "see" John Middleton v. J.E. McDonald
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kellogg v. Strack, 269 F.3d 100, 104 (2d Cir. 2001) (holding that a 26-month delay was “a period of time which constitutes a patently unreasonable delay absent mitigating circumstances”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 932 (2002); Watkins, 169 F.3d at 544 (expressing “considerable trepidation” about whether a 17-month delay was reasonable, but ultimately finding that the issue was not properly before the court); Nucor Corp. v. Neb.
discussed Cited "see" Aurelio O. Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, Michael W. Moore, Secretary
11th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kellogg v. Strack, 269 F.3d 100, 103 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 932 , 122 S.Ct. 1306 , 152 L.Ed.2d 216 (2002); Rutledge v. United States, 230 F.3d 1041, 1046-47 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1199 , 121 S.Ct. 1207 , 149 L.Ed.2d 120 (2001); Morris v. Horn, 187 F.3d 333, 336 (3d Cir.1999); Langford v. Day, 134 F.3d 1381, 1382 (9th Cir.1998); Zeitvogel v. Bowersox, 103 F.3d 56, 57 (8th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Pressley v. Bennett (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 366-68; see United States v. Bennett, 252 F.3d 559, 567 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 932 , 122 S.Ct. 1307 , 152 L.Ed.2d 217 (2002) (“[i]n assessing the constitutionality of a sentence under the Eighth Amendment, the court must assess the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty, the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction, and the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eqbal
v.
United States
01-1203.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
535 U.S. 932
Published

535 U.S. 932

EQBAL ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-1203.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 18, 2002.

1

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 27 Fed. Appx. 728.