green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Virgil v. Dretke
See Schaetzle v. Cockrell, 343 F.3d 440, 443 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Santellan v. Cockrell, 271 F.3d 190, 193 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 982 , 122 S.Ct. 1463 , 152 L.Ed.2d 461 (2002); Neal v. Puckett, 286 F.3d 230, 246 (5th Cir.2002) (en banc)). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kathy Yolande Miller v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
See Schaetzle v. Cockrell, 343 F.3d 440, 443 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Santellan v. Cockrell, 271 F.3d 190, 193 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 982 , 122 S.Ct. 1463 , 152 L.Ed.2d 461 (2002); Neal v. Puckett, 286 F.3d 230, 246 (5th Cir.2002) (en banc)). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fenton
See United States v. Palmer, 248 F.3d 569, 570 (7th Cir.2001) (per curiam), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1012 , 122 S.Ct. 1594 , 152 L.Ed.2d 510 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. Cockrell
See Santellan v. Cockrell, 271 F.3d 190, 198 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 982 , 122 S.Ct. 1463 , 152 L.Ed.2d 461 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Detention of Wilber W.
See Glick v. Arizona, 535 U.S. 982 , 122 S.Ct. 1535 , 152 L.Ed.2d 461 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Castagna
See, e.g., State v. Krivacska, 341 N.J.Super. 1, 41 , 775 A. 2d 6 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 170 N.J. 206 , 785 A. 2d 435 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1012 , 122 S.Ct. 1594 , 152 L.Ed. 2d 510 (2002) (sexual assaults about two years apart were "reasonably proximate in time").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baez
v.
Nike Inc. Et Al.
v.
Nike Inc. Et Al.
01-8161.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2002.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal mat[*983] ters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.