green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See Dorsey v. Chapman, 262 F.3d 1181 , 1186 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding that the petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's failure to call an expert witness because the petitioner failed to show that counsel's decision was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen that strategy), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1000 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
See Dorsey v. Chapman, 262 F.3d 1181 , 1186 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding that the petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel’s failure to call an expert witness because the petitioner failed to show that counsel’s decision was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen that strategy), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1000 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Archiquette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See Dorsey v. Chapman, 262 F.3d 1181 , 1186 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding that the petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's failure to call an expert witness because the petitioner failed to show that counsel's decision was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen that strategy), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1000 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheffield v. State
See Dorsey v. Chapman, 262 F.3d 1181 , 1185-86 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied 535 U.S. 1000 , 122 S.Ct. 1567 , 152 L.Ed.2d 489 (2002); Fugate v. Head, 261 F.3d 1206, 1219 (11th Cir. 2001), quoting Messer v. Kemp, 760 F.2d 1080, 1090 (11th Cir.1985); Phillips v. State, 277 Ga. 161, 163 , 587 S.E.2d 45, 47 (2003); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cargle v. Mullin
While § 2254(e)(2) refers only to evidentiary hearings, it governs as well “[w]hen expansion of the record is used to achieve the same end as an evidentiary hearing.” Boyko v. Parke, 259 F.3d 781, 790 (7th Cir.2001); see Dorsey v. Chapman, 262 F.3d 1181 , 1190 (11th Cir.2001), ce rt. denied, 535 U.S. 1000 , 122 S.Ct. 1567 , 152 L.Ed.2d 489 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cox
v.
Lindsey, Warden
v.
Lindsey, Warden
01-8385.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2002.
Published
COX
v.
LINDSEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
No. 01-8385.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 15, 2002.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.