MacKintrush v. Arkansas, 535 U.S. 1019 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
MacKintrush v. Arkansas, 535 U.S. 1019 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 7× by 2 distinct cases · "Wrinkles II"
117 citation events (117 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wrinkles v. State (ind, 2009-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Wrinkles v. State (2×)
Ind. · 2009 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
wrinkles ii
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bates
Or. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wrinkles v. State, 749 NE2d 1179, 1194 (Ind 2001), cert den, 535 US 1019 (2002) (prohibiting, prospectively, the use of stun belts because, among other reasons, “[a] pain infliction device that has the potential to compromise an individual’s ability to participate in his or her own defense does not belong in a court of law” (quoting Hawkins v. Comparet-Cassani, 33 F Supp 2d 1244, 1262 (CD Cal 1999))); see also People v. Martinez, 347 Ill App 3d 1001, 1006, 808 NE2d 1089, 1093 , appeal den, 211 Ill 2d 601, 823 NE2d 974 (2004) (McDade, J., concurring) (arguing “that fundamental princ…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Slater (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D. Utah · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 271 F.3d 1262, 1269 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1019 , 122 S.Ct. 1610 , 152 L.Ed.2d 624 (2002); Soto, 988 F.2d at 1556 & n. 4 (providing that extreme nervousness, when combined with other factors, can be a basis for reasonable suspicion).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Virgen-Franco
D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Williams, 271 F.3d 1262, 1267 (10th Cir.2001) ce rt. denied, 535 U.S. 1019 , 122 S.Ct. 1610 , 152 L.Ed.2d 624 (2002) (travel plans questions may be asked to determine lawful’possession of rental vehicle).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robles
D. Utah · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 84 F.3d 1244, 1250-51 (10th Cir.1996) (concluding that questions asked of driver, which included who owned car, travel plans, the passenger’s identity and how long he had known the passenger, were justified by concerns the car might be stolen and did not violate Fourth Amendment); Galindo-Gonzales, 142 F.3d at 1224 (concluding that where driver failed to produce any vehicle registration document, officer’s questions-which included questions about passengers’ identity-were sufficiently related to determining ownership of the vehicle and therefore reason…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MacKintrush
v.
Arkansas
01-8426.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 2002.
535 U.S. 1019
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Indiana Supreme Court (2)

535 U.S. 1019

MACKINTRUSH
v.
ARKANSAS.

No. 01-8426.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 22, 2002.

1

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 346 Ark. xx.