Prescott v. State, 456 P.2d 450 (Nev. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Prescott v. State, 456 P.2d 450 (Nev. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: TRP INT'L, INC. VS. PROIMTU MMI LLC (nev, 2017-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) TRP INT'L, INC. VS. PROIMTU MMI LLC (2×)
Nev. · 2017 · confidence medium
Say. & Loan Ass'n, 85 Nev. 441, 443 , 456 P.2d 450, 452 (1969) (stating that an order granting a motion for rehearing is appealable as a special order after final judgment).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) TRP INT'L, INC. VS. PROIMTU MMI LLC
Nev. · 2017 · confidence medium
Say. & Loan Ass'n, 85 Nev. 441, 443 , 456 P.2d 450, 452 (1969) (stating that an order granting a motion for rehearing is appealable as a special order after final judgment).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Gardner v. Letcher
Nev. · 2013 · confidence medium
Savings & Loan Ass'n, 85 Nev. 441, 452 , 456 P.2d 450, 443 (1969) (stating that a post-judgment order granting rehearing is appealable); cf. Gumm u.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Ashokan v. State, Department of Insurance
Nev. · 1993 · confidence medium
“No appeal will be allowed unless it is authorized by statute or by rule of court properly promulgated.” Bates v. Nevada Savings & Loan Ass’n, 85 Nev. 441, 443 , 456 P.2d 450, 451 (1969).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clark County Liquor & Gaming Licensing Board v. Clark
Nev. · 1986 · confidence medium
Jarstad v. National Farmer’s Union, 92 Nev. 380, 383 , 552 P.2d 49, 51 (1976); Bates v. Nevada Savings and Loan Association, 85 Nev. 441, 443 , 456 P.2d 450, 451 (1969); Johns-Manville, Inc. v. Lander County, 48 Nev. 244, 246 , 229 P. 387 (1924).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Lucas v. Page
Nev. · 1973 · confidence medium
Bates v. Nevada Savings & Loan Ass’n, 85 Nev. 441, 443 , 456 P.2d 450, 451 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Fernandez v. Infusaid Corp.
Nev. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bates v. Nevada Savings & Loan Ass’n, 85 Nev. 441 , 456 P.2d 450 (1969).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Alvis v. State
Nev. · 1983 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Bates v. Nevada Savings & Loan Ass’n, 85 Nev. 441 , 456 P.2d 450 (1969) (order granting rehearing is appealable as a special order after final judgment).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Hughes v. First National Bank of Nevada
Nev. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re Ray’s Estate, supra; see also Bates v. Nevada Savings and Loan Assn., 85 Nev. 441 , 456 P.2d 450 (1969); Nevada Land & Mortgage Co. v. Lamb, 90 Nev. 247 524 P.2d 326 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ASHLEY L. PRESCOTT, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
5624.
Nevada Supreme Court.
Jul 14, 1969.
456 P.2d 450
Martillaro and Bucchianeri, of Carson City, for Appellant., Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, William J. Raggio, District Attorney, and Virgil D. Dutt, Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying Prescott’s pre-trial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. His petition did not challenge the jurisdiction of the court, the sufficiency of the evidence to hold him for trial, nor does it assert that a public offense was not charged. He does attack the legality of his arrest, and the admissibility of evidence which he claims to have been secured by an illegal search. Those matters are to be presented by motion. NRS 174.-105(1). [1]

Affirmed.

1

NRS 174.105(1) provides: “Defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution, other than insufficiency of the evidence to warrant an indictment, or in the indictment, information or complaint, other than that it fails to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense, may be raised only by motion before trial. The motion shall include all such defenses and objections then available to the defendant.”