State v. Hopkins, 874 P.2d 827 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hopkins, 874 P.2d 827 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Sweeney (orctapp, 2022-10-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sweeney (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hopkins, 127 Or App 1, 4 , 870 P2d 849 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 127 Or App 622 , 874 P2d 827 (1994) (evidence that defendant possessed stolen credit cards and had cashed a forged check earlier in the day was admissible 446 State v. Sweeney to establish his motive to escape police).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
James Scott HOPKINS, Appellant.
90-11-36303 CA A70109.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 4, 1994.
874 P.2d 827
Richardson, C.J., and Deits and Riggs.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., for motion.

[*828] Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and RIGGS, JJ.

On Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration March 30, 1994.

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

The state moves for reconsideration, ORAP 6.25, of our opinion in State v. Hopkins, 127 Or.App. 1, 870 P.2d 849 (1994), in which we addressed defendant's unpreserved error regarding his post-prison supervision term and remanded for resentencing. The state argues that we should not have reached that error and cites, inter alia, State v. Slawson, 123 Or.App. 573, 860 P.2d 876 (1993). Defendant's error is unpreserved and we agree with the state that, under the rationale of Slawson, we should not have addressed it. Accordingly, we modify our opinion to withdraw our discussion of that error and affirm.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; affirmed.