green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fuentes v. State of Washington
The Court determined it was unclear whether Petitioner 19 had exhausted the claim and ordered him to amend his petition “to clearly and 20 concisely present those grounds for federal habeas relief which have been exhausted.” ECF No. 7 at 6. 21 1 of the doubt.” Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 24 , 123 S. Ct. 357 , 154 L.Ed. 2d 2 279 (2002) (per curiam). 3 A federal court may not grant relief on any claim that was adjudicated on the 4 merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim (1) “resulted in 5 a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable …
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruth Dyer v. Shannon Lee
See Willingham v. Loughnan, 261 F.3d 1178, 1183 (11th Cir.2001) (“[A] finding of excessive force by the jury in this civil case does not necessarily call into question the validity of section 1983 Plaintiffs criminal conviction [for attempted murder and battery of an officer].”), cert. granted and vacated on other grounds, 537 U.S. 801 , 123 S.Ct. 68 , 154 L.Ed.2d 2 (2002). 4 These cases do not address the specific argument put forward here, that a successful § 1983 suit should be barred because it would establish that the plaintiff would have had an affirmative defense to the underlying …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirk Dixon v. Nathan S. Pollock
Pollock admits, in an accurate statement of the law, that "[i]t is possible for an excessive-force action and a battery conviction to coexist without running afoul of Heck ." Appellee Br. at 5; see also Willingham v. Loughnan , 261 F.3d 1178 , 1183 (11th Cir. 2001), rev'd on other grounds , 537 U.S. 801 , 123 S.Ct. 68 , 154 L.Ed.2d 2 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Republican Caucus of Pennsylvania House of Representatives
v.
Vieth
v.
Vieth
01-1713.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
REPUBLICAN CAUCUS OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
v.
VIETH ET AL.
No. 01-1713.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
2
Appeal from D. C. M. D. Pa. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Reported below: 188 F. Supp. 2d 532.