green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jones
We review the denial of such a motion for abuse of discretion, see, e.g., United States v. Doe, 272 F.3d 116 , 122 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 851 , 123 S.Ct. 204 , 154 L.Ed.2d 82 (2002), using a three- or four-factor test, to wit, “(1) whether defendant made a timely motion requesting new counsel; (2) whether the trial court adequately inquired into the matter; and (3) whether the conflict between the defendant and his attorney was so great that it resulted in a total lack of communication preventing an adequate defense,” id. (internal quotation marks omitted); and (4) if there …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Luke Jones
We review the denial of such a motion for abuse of discretion, see, e.g., United States v. Doe, 272 F.3d 116 , 122 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 851 , 123 S.Ct. 204 , 154 L.Ed.2d 82 (2002), using a three or four-factor test, to wit, “(1) whether defendant made a timely motion requesting new counsel; (2) whether the trial court adequately inquired into the matter; and (3) whether the conflict between the defendant and his attorney was so great that it resulted in a total lack of communication preventing an adequate defense,” id. (internal quotation marks omitted); and (4) if there w…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garza-Garza
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-10588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
GARZA-GARZA
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-10588.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 33 Fed. Appx. 703.