green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Carl Blue v. Rick Thaler, Director
See Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 948 (5th Cir.2001) (holding that, in the broad run of cases, a state court’s denial of a full and fair hearing "does not permit the district court to avoid the application of deference to the state court's adjudication on the merits”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002); see also id. at 951 ("[W]e hold that a full and fair hearing is not a precondition to according § 2254(e)(l)’s presumption of correctness to state habeas court findings of fact nor to applying § 2254(d)'s standards of review.”). 29 .
cited
Cited "see"
Robidoux v. O'BRIEN
See generally Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 949-50 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Allridge v. Cockrell
See Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 949 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gallegos v. Quarterman
See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (e)(1); see also Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 950-51 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guidry v. Dretke
See, e.g., Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 948, 952 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002); Barrientes v. Johnson, 221 F.3d 741, 770 (5th Cir.2000) (citing McDonald v. Johnson, 139 F.3d 1056, 1059-60 (5th Cir.1998)). 108 a. 109 According to the State, the district court hearing permitted the district court improperly to substitute its credibility determinations for those by the state court, contravening AEDPA's policy goals.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guidry v. Dretke
See, e.g., Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 948, 952 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002); Barrientes v. Johnson, 221 F.3d 741, 770 (5th Cir.2000) (citing McDonald v. Johnson, 139 F.3d 1056, 1059-60 (5th Cir.1998)). a.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey Welton Nunes v. G.A. Mueller, Warden
(2×)
See also Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 951 (5th Cir.2001) (holding that AEDPA deference applies to state-court findings of fact based on a review of the record), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodwin R. Brodit v. Steven J. Cambra, Jr., Warden
(2×)
Compare Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 950-51 (5th Cir.2001) (holding that AEDPA deference applies to state-court findings of fact based on a review of the record), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 883 , 123 S.Ct. 106 , 154 L.Ed.2d 141 (2002), with Bryan v. Mullin, 335 F.3d 1207, 1215-16 (10th Cir.2003) (en banc) (holding that pre-AEDPA standards apply to ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims unless the state court holds an evidentiary hearing). 2 Finally, because the district court credited counsel's testimony, we need not decide how we would resolve a case in which counsel's stated reasons were …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clinkscale
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-85.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
CLINKSCALE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-85.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 30 Fed. Appx. 330.