green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Timothy Terell Mckinney v. State of Tennessee
See State v. McKinney, 74 S.W.3d 291 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 926 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Richard Odom, a/k/a Otis Smith
(2×)
See State v. McKinney, 74 S.W.3d 291, 319 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 321 , 154 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002). (3) there are no uniform standards or procedures for jury selection to insure open inquiry concerning potentially prejudicial subject matter.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jepsen
(2×)
See United States v. Fernandez , 58 F.3d 593 , 600 (11th Cir.1995) ; United States v. Mejias , 47 F.3d 401 , 404 (11th Cir.1995) ; see also United States v. Acosta , 287 F.3d 1034 , 1036-37 (11th Cir.) (holding that prior felony drug offense adjudication under New York's youthful offender statute was prior conviction for sentence enhancement purposes under § 841 ), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 321 , 154 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Daye Storer
(2×)
See United States v. Fernandez, 58 F.3d 593, 600 (11th Cir.1995); United States v. Mejias, 47 F.3d 401, 404 (11th Cir.1995); see also United States v. Acosta, 287 F.3d 1034, 1036-37 (11th Cir.) (holding that prior felony drug offense adjudication under New York’s youthful offender statute was prior conviction for sentence enhancement purposes under § 841), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 321 , 154 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Daye Storer
See United States v. Fernandez, 58 F.3d 593, 600 (11th Cir. 1995); United States v. Mejias, 47 F.3d 401, 404 (11th Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Acosta, 287 F.3d 1034 , 1036–37 (11th Cir.) (holding that prior felony drug offense adjudication under New York's youthful offender statute was prior conviction for sentence enhancement purposes under § 841), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 926 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Andrew Thomas and Anthony Bond
See, e.g., State v. McKinney, 74 S.W.3d 291, 299 (Tenn.), cert. den. 537 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 321 (2002), (defendant shot unarmed victim in back of neck from close range); Sims, 45 S.W.3d at 19 (defendant shot unarmed victim in back of head with no provocation); State v. Henderson, 24 S.W.3d 307, 316 (Tenn.), cert. den. 531 U.S. 934 , 121 S.Ct. 320 (2000), (defendant shot unarmed and unconscious deputy sheriff in head at close range); Bland, 958 S.W.2d at 670 (defendant shot unarmed victim); Stout, 46 S.W.3d at 707 (defendant shot victim in back of head with no provocation).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herrera-Diaz
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-5642.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
HERRERA-DIAZ
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-5642.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 37 Fed. Appx. 504.