green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“apprendi merely clarified and extended the scope of a pre-existing right the right to have all convictions supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Meade
apprendi merely clarified and extended the scope of a pre-existing right the right to have all convictions supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Clarke
See United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1218 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002); Ashley v. United States, 266 F.3d 671, 673 (7th Cir.2001); United States v. Lopez, 248 F.3d 427, 431 (5th Cir.2001); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 , 146 n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001) (all holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(3)(C), which requires a retroactivity determination to be made by the Supreme Court itself, does not apply to initial petitions). 35 Accord, United States *1053 v. Moss, 252 F.3d 998, …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ashon Leftenant
See United States v. Bennafield, 287 F.3d 320, 323-24 (4th Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002) (holding that defendant could only be convicted of single act of possession for simultaneous possession of multiple packages of cocaine); United States v. Dunford, 148 F.3d 385, 389-90 (4th Cir.1998) (holding that defendant could only be convicted of single act of possession where multiple firearms were seized at single time and location).
cited
Cited "see"
Spears v. Mullin
See United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1219 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrasco
See United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1219 (10th Cir.) (Apprendi “is not retroactively applicable to initial habeas petitions”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002); United States v. Cemobyl, 255 F.3d 1215, 1218-19 (10th Cir.2001) (§ 841(b)(1) not unconstitutional due to Apprendi).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Riggans
See, e.g., United States v. Bennafield, 287 F.3d 320, 325 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002); United States v. Butler, 74 F.3d 916 , 918 n. 1 (9th Cir.1996); Leverett v. Spears, 877 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Teague v. Palmateer
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mora, 293 F3d 1213 (10th Cir 2002), cert den, _ US _, 154 L Ed 2d 315 (2002); San-Miguel v. Dove, 291 F3d 257 (4th Cir 2002), cert den, _ US _ , 154 L Ed 2d 242 (2002); United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F3d 664 (9th Cir 2002), cert den, _ US _ , 154 L Ed 2d 243 (2002); Murphy v. United States, 268 F3d 599 (8th Cir 2001), cert den, 534 US 1169 (2002); McCoy v. United States, 266 F3d 1245 (11th Cir 2001), cert den, _ US _, 153 L Ed 2d 183 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
v.
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
02-6105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
Cited by 38 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)
BROWN
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 02-6105.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 15, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 46 Fed. Appx. 732.