Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 522 P.2d 61 (Idaho 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 522 P.2d 61 (Idaho 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Parker v. Parker (idaho, 1975-10-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Parker v. Parker
Idaho · 1975 · confidence medium
“An order holding a person in contempt is not an appealable order under I.C. § 7-614.” Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 95 Idaho 853, 853 , 522 P.2d 61, 61 (1974).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Whitman (2×)
Idaho · 1975 · confidence medium
Also see Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 , 85 S.Ct. 1731 , 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965). 3 . 95 Idaho at 853, 522 P.2d at 63.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Olivia Kay Schultz (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853 , 855, 522 P.2d 61 , 63 (1974); McFarland, 125 Idaho at 877-79 , 876 P.2d at 159-61 ; State v. Sabin, 120 Idaho 780, 783-84 , 820 P.2d 375 , 378- 79 (Ct. App. 1991).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Shultz (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853, 855 , 522 P.2d 61, 63 (1974); McFarland, 125 Idaho at 877-79 , 876 P.2d at 159-61 ; State v. Sabin, 120 Idaho 780, 783-84 , 820 P.2d 375, 378-79 (Ct.App.1991).
examined Cited "see" State v. Durham (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Idaho Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853, 855 , 522 P.2d 61, 63 (1974); State v. McFarland, 125 Idaho 876, 880 , 876 P.2d 158, 162 (Ct.App.1994).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Collins (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853, 855 , 522 P.2d 61, 63 (1974); State v. McFarland, 125 Idaho 876, 879 , 876 P.2d 158, 161 (Ct.App.1994).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Adams (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974); State v. McFarland, 125 Idaho 876 , 876 P.2d 158 (Ct.App.1994); State v. Sabin, 120 Idaho 780 , 820 P.2d 375 (Ct.App.1991).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jones (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974) (concluding that where PSI described defendant as a family man and dependable worker without a prior criminal record who committed rape upon his estranged wife without any explanation, the absence of a psychological evaluation rendered the PSI deficient because it deprived the court of information essential to the pronouncement of an appropriate judgment); State v. McFarland, 125 Idaho 876 , 876 P.2d 158 (Ct.App.1994) (where PSI described the defendant as a young man with extremely low intelligence from a dysfunctional family and with no p…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Springer (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. French, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974); State v. Gowin, 97 Idaho 146 , 540 P.2d 808 (1975), appeal after remand, 99 Idaho 195 , 579 P.2d 692 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Shaub v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District (2×)
Idaho · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 94 Idaho 585 , 494 P.2d 1029 (1972), and Glenn Dale Ranches v. Shaub, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Izaguirre (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. French, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974); State v. Collins, 144 Idaho 408, 409-10 , 162 P.3d 787, 788-89 (Ct.App.2007); State v. Craner, 137 Idaho 188 , 45 P.3d 844 (Ct.App. 2002); State v. McFarland, 125 Idaho 876 , 876 P.2d 158 (Ct.App.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reeves v. Reynolds (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974); Mathison v. Felton, 90 Idaho 87 , 408 P.2d 457 (1965); Levan v. Richards, 4 Idaho 667 , 43 P. 574 (1896).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Contempt of Reeves (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 95 Idaho 853 , 522 P.2d 61 (1974); Mathison v. Felton, 90 Idaho 87 , 408 P.2d 457 (1965); Levan v. Richards, 4 Idaho 667 , 43 P. 574 (1896).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GLENN DALE RANCHES, INC., an Idaho Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Norris SHAUB, Defendant-Appellant, Clara Terry Boyd Et Al., Defendants
11219.
Idaho Supreme Court.
May 10, 1974.
522 P.2d 61
T. V. Behm, Buhl, Webb, Pike, Burton & Carlson, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant., Hepworth, Nungester & Felton, John C. Hepworth, Buhl, for plaintiff-respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court wherein the court held appellant Norris Shaub in contempt for violating a permanent injunction which prohibited appellant from diverting more than 10 miners inches of water from the Mendini Tunnel.

An order holding a person in contempt is not an appealable order under I.C. § 7-614. In Barnett v. Reed, 93 Idaho 319, 460 P.2d 744 (1969), this Court stated:

“While the order holding a person in contempt is not appealable under I.C. § 7-614, the writ of review has. been recognized as a proper method by which the actions of a court in a contempt proceeding can be reviewed. Mathison v. Felton, 90 Idaho 87, 408 P.2d 457 (1965).” 93 Idaho at 321, 460 P.2d at 746.

Appellant may petition for a writ of review in accordance with the procedures set forth in I.C. § 7-201 et seq. See Dutton v. District Court of Third Judicial District, County of Owyhee, 95 Idaho 720, 518 P.2d 1182 (1974).

Appeal dismissed. No costs allowed.