green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2003 ·
…statute need not fit all three factors to be considered a bill of attainder; rather, those factors are the evidence that is weighed together in resolving a bill of attainder claim.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Foretich, Doris v. United States
(2×)
statute need not fit all three factors to be considered a bill of attainder; rather, those factors are the evidence that is weighed together in resolving a bill of attainder claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bobby Bland v. B. Roberts
This directive is particularly salient, given that qualified immunity is predicated on the notion that “a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.” Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 (1982); accord Trulock v. Freeh, 275 F.3d 391, 400 (4th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bobby Bland v. B. Roberts
(2×)
This directive is particularly salient, given that qualified immunity is predicated on the notion that “a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.” Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); accord Tru-lock v. Freeh, 275 F.3d 391 , 400 (4th Cir. 2001), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 621 , 154 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pecorino v. Vutec Corp.
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft v. Sonotone Corp., 370 F.Supp. 970, 972 (N.D.Ill.1973) (citations omitted); see Wild v. Subscription Plus, Inc., 292 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 619 , 154 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002) (concluding that to avoid injustice “there is no absolute bar to the transfer of a multidefendant suit to a district in which one of the defendants cannot be served.”); see also Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585, 364 U.S. 19 , 80 S.Ct. 1470 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1540 (1960) (espousing a common sense approach and directing that “where it might have been b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wentz v. Ames
“Government officials may not be held liable for the unconstitutional conduct of their subordinates under a theory of respondeat superior. * * * 31 Because vicarious liability is inapplicable to . . . § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant, through the officials own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 , 129 S.Ct. 1936 , 1948, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); see also Trulock v. Freeh, 275 F.3d 391, 402 (4th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 621 , 154 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002)(“In a Bivens suit t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gold v. Joyce
Because vicarious liability is inapplicable to . . . § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant, through the officials own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 (2009); see also Trulock v. Freeh, 275 F.3d 391, 402 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 (2002) (“In a Bivens suit there is no respondeat superior liability. . . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deakins v. Pack
“Government officials may not be held liable for the unconstitutional conduct of their subordinates under a theory of respondeat superior. * * * Because vicarious liability is inapplicable to ... § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant, through the officials own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 , 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1948 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); see also Trulock v. Freeh, 275 F.3d 391, 402 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 621 , 154 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002)(“In a Bivens suit there i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Long Term Care Pharmacy Alliance v. Ferguson
Compare Pa. Pharmacists Ass’n, 283 F.3d at 541-42 , and Walgreen Co. v. Hood, 275 F.3d 475, 478 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 951 , 122 S.Ct. 2645 , 153 L.Ed.2d 823 (2002)(no right of action), with Westside Mothers v. Haveman, 289 F.3d 852, 863-64 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 618 , 154 L.Ed.2d 516 (2002), Methodist Hosps. v. Sullivan, 91 F.3d 1026 , 1029 (7th Cir.1996), Bul len, 93 F.3d at 1005-06 , and Ark.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughlett v. Romer-Sensky
Id. at 340-41 (citation omitted); see also Westside Mothers v. Have man, 289 F.3d 852 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 618 , 154 L.Ed.2d 516 (2002) (Medicaid’s screening and treatment provisions created right privately enforceable under § 1983). 3 Looking beyond plaintiffs’ broad assertion that federal standards for child support enforcement services are intended to “benefit” Title IV-D families, the district court found the amended complaint should be narrowly read to assert only a federal right conferred by § 657(a)(2) concerning limits on the authority of the OD…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. FLRA 283 F.3d 339, 341 (D.C.Cir.), cert denied, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 618 , 154 L.Ed.2d 516 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grossman v. United States
"Canons of construction need not be conclusive,” the Supreme Court recently stated, "and are often countered ... by some maxim pointing in a different direction.” Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105, 115 , 121 S.Ct. 1302 , 149 L.Ed.2d 234 (2001); see also Nat'l Data Corp. & Subs. v. United States, 50 Fed.Cl. 24 (2001), aff'd, 291 F.3d 1381 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom., NDCHealth Corp. & Subs. v. United States, 537 U.S. 1045 , 123 S.Ct. 619 , 154 L.Ed.2d 517 (2002). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haveman, Director, Michigan Department of Community Health
v.
Westside Mothers, a Michigan Welfare Rights Organization
v.
Westside Mothers, a Michigan Welfare Rights Organization
02-277.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
HAVEMAN, DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
v.
WESTSIDE MOTHERS, A MICHIGAN WELFARE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION, ET AL.
No. 02-277.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 2, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 289 F. 3d 852.