green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Durbin v. Province
See Bullock v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1044, 1046 (10th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1093 , 123 S.Ct. 703 , 154 L.Ed.2d 640 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. King
See Bullock v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1057 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1093 , 123 S.Ct. 703 , 154 L.Ed.2d 640 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mora v. Williams
See Bullock v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1048 (10th Cir.) (“an attorney’s unawareness of relevant law at the time he made the challenged decision does not, in and of itself, render the attorney’s performance constitutionally deficient”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1093 , 123 S.Ct. 703 , 154 L.Ed.2d 640 (2002); Hawkins v. Hannigan, 185 F.3d 1146, 1154-55 (10th Cir.1999) (even assuming counsel was mistaken as to the scope of the stipulation, the decision to enter the stipulation was a reasonable trial decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. Mullin
See id. at 697 . “[T]he overriding question under the [performance] prong of Strickland is whether, under all the circumstances, counsel performed in an objectively unreasonable manner.” Bullock v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1046 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1093 , 123 S.Ct. 703 , 154 L.Ed.2d 640 (2002); see also Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688, 690 . “[W]e always start th[at] analysis [by presuming] that an attorney acted in an objectively reasonable manner and that an attorney’s challenged conduct might have been part of a sound trial strategy.” Bullock, 297 F.3d at 1046 ; see also …
cited
Cited "see"
Willner v. Soares
See Bullock v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1055 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 703 , 154 L.Ed.2d 640 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spears v. Mullin
(2×)
When, as here, habeas petitioners challenge the admission of photographic evidence as violative of the Constitution, this court considers “whether the admission of evidence ... so infected the sentencing proceeding with unfairness as to render the jury’s imposition of the death penalty a denial of due process.” Romano v. Oklahoma, 512 U.S. 1, 12 , 114 S.Ct. 2004 , 129 L.Ed.2d 1 (1994); see also Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 131 n. 6, 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968) (“An important element of a fair trial is that a jury consider only relevant and competent evidence bearin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Metoyer v. Scott
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 (internal quotation and citation omitted); see also Bullock *529 v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1046 (10th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1093 , 123 S.Ct. 703 , 154 L.Ed.2d 640 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthews
See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 477 and 477 n. 3, 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000); Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116, 123 , 119 S.Ct. 1887 , 144 L.Ed.2d 117 (1999); United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 510 , 115 S.Ct. 2310 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995); Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 73 , 112 S.Ct. 475 , 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991); Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 502 , 96 S.Ct. 1691 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); see also Bullock v. Carver, 297 F.3d 1036, 1054 (10th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moten
v.
Kyler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon
v.
Kyler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon
02-7172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 2002.
Published
MOTEN
v.
KYLER, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT HUNTINGDON, ET AL.
No. 02-7172.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 16, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.