green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“the particularity requirement of rule 9(b), if enforced, will not only protect defendants against strike suits, but will result in claims with discernable boundaries and manageable discovery limits.”
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bonzani v. United Technologies Corporation
the particularity requirement of rule 9(b), if enforced, will not only protect defendants against strike suits, but will result in claims with discernable boundaries and manageable discovery limits.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation
See In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation, 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1105 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed.2d 774 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter Of: Bridgestone/firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation. Appeals Of: Ford Motor Company, Bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, L.L.C., and Bridgestone Corporation
See In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation, 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1105 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed.2d 774 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
See In re Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir.2002) cert. den. 537 U.S. 1105 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed.2d 774 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
(2×)
See also, In re Bridgestone/[Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d 1012, 1015 (7th Cir.2002) cert. denied Gustafson v. Bridgestone/[Firestone, Inc., 537 U.S. 1105 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed.2d 774 (2003)[Because plaintiffs' claims rest on state law, the choice-of-law rules come from the state in which the federal court sits.]. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beegal v. Park West Gallery
Fink, supra, 365 N.J.Super. at 570-84 , 839 A. 2d 942 (conducting detailed analysis of differences between New Jersey's consumer fraud statute and those of other states); see also In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F. 3d 1012, 1018 (7th Cir.2002) ("[s]tate consumer protection laws vary considerably"), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1105 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed. 2d 774 (2003); Int'l Union, supra, 384 N.J.Super. at 293-94 , 894 A. 2d 1136 (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States Ex Rel. Clausen
v.
Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc
v.
Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc
02-534.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (1)
UNITED STATES EX REL. CLAUSEN
v.
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC.
No. 02-534.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 13, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 290 F. 3d 1301.