Logiodice v. Trs. of Maine Cent. Inst., 537 U.S. 1107 (2003). · Go Syfert
Logiodice v. Trs. of Maine Cent. Inst., 537 U.S. 1107 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is well settled that an error, even one of constitutional magnitude, that defendant does not bring to the trial court's attention is waived and will not be considered on appeal.”
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Dean (ncctapp, 2009-04-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Dean
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is well settled that an error, even one of constitutional magnitude, that defendant does not bring to the trial court's attention is waived and will not be considered on appeal.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Moore
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Wiley, 355 N.C. 592 , 565 S.E.2d 22 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1117 , 123 S.Ct. 882 , 154 L.Ed.2d 795 (2003) (holding: (1) following notice of mail scrutiny, defendant had unreasonable expectation of privacy in mail; (2) prison officials permitted to seize and copy mail without warrant); State v. Martin, 77 Conn.App. 778 , 825 A.2d 835 (2003), *1102 certification denied, 266 Conn. 906 , 832 A.2d 73 (2003) (holding department of corrections notified defendant his mail would be read, thus, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his letters); Merritt v. State, 982 S.W.2d …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." ROETTGEN v. Ryan
C.D. Cal. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465 , 127 S.Ct. 1933, 1940 , 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007) (if record refutes applicant’s factual allegations or otherwise precludes habeas relief, court not required to hold evidentiary hearing); Phillips v. Woodford, 267 F.3d 966, 973 (9th Cir.2001) (assuming petitioner did not "fail to develop” his claim in the state court, petitioner "is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only if: (1) the allegations in his petition would, if proved, entitle him to relief; and (2) the state court trier of fact has not, after a full and fair hearing, reliably found the releva…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Logiodice
v.
Trustees of Maine Central Institute
02-632.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
537 U.S. 1107

537 U.S. 1107

LOGIODICE
v.
TRUSTEES OF MAINE CENTRAL INSTITUTE ET AL.

No. 02-632.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 13, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 296 F. 3d 22.