Westaff (Usa) Inc., as Adm'r of the W. Staff Servs. Emp. Heath Plan, Dba W. Staff Servs. v. Arce, 537 U.S. 1111 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Westaff (Usa) Inc., as Adm'r of the W. Staff Servs. Emp. Heath Plan, Dba W. Staff Servs. v. Arce, 537 U.S. 1111 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Myrna Ochoa-Carrillo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America (ca8, 2006-02-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Myrna Ochoa-Carrillo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alvarez-Portillo v. Ashcroft, 280 F.3d 858, 862-63 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1111 , 123 S.Ct. 864 , 154 L.Ed.2d 784 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. v. Sereboff
D. Maryland · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Westaff (USA) v. Arce, 298 F.3d 1164, 1167 (9th Cir.2002) (reasoning that even though funds recovered by the insured are in the insured’s possession (escrow account) and identifiable, an action to determine the rights of the insurer under the plan’s sub- *696 rogation clause is a request for legal relief and not authorized by § 502(a)(3)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1111 , 123 S.Ct. 901 , 154 L.Ed.2d 784 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Julio Cesar Briones-Sanchez v. Gerard Heinauer, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Alvarez-Portillo v. Ashcroft, 280 F.3d 858 , 861 n. 1 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 864 , 154 L.Ed.2d 784 (2003) ("Immigration law can be confusing to the outsider because experts usually refer to the statutes by their INA and IIRIRA section numbers, while most of us have access only to the codified version of those statutes.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Francisco Tomas Lopez v. Gerard Heinauer, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a), (b)(1), (2) (providing for judicial review of a final order of removal in the court of appeals if the petition for review is filed within thirty days of the date of the order); see also Alvarez-Portillo v. Ashcroft, 280 F.3d 858, 868 (8th Cir.2002) (reviewing a reinstatement order through a § 1252(a)(1) petition for review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 864 , 154 L.Ed.2d 784 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Westaff (Usa) Inc., as Administrator of the Western Staff Services Employee Heath Plan, Dba Western Staff Services
v.
Arce
02-752.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
537 U.S. 1111
Published

537 U.S. 1111

WESTAFF (USA) INC., AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE WESTERN STAFF SERVICES EMPLOYEE HEATH PLAN, DBA WESTERN STAFF SERVICES
v.
ARCE.

No. 02-752.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 13, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 298 F. 3d 1164.