Thomas v. Watkins, Warden, 537 U.S. 1122 (2003). · Go Syfert
Thomas v. Watkins, Warden, 537 U.S. 1122 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rosati v. Kernan (cacd, 2006-01-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rosati v. Kernan
C.D. Cal. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Petitioner concedes he received his trial transcripts and papers before the statute of limitations commenced to run, Petition at 657-58, 4 and petitioner has not explained how the lack of the additional transcripts he desired prevented him from timely filing his federal habeas corpus petition. 5 Spitsyn, 345 F.3d at 799 ; see also Lloyd v. Van Natta, 296 F.3d 630 , *1133 633-34 (7th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (Petitioner not entitled to equitable tolling due to lack of trial transcript where petitioner “was present at trial and knew the basis on which he could have asserted [his habe-as claims].…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas
v.
Watkins, Warden
02-7188.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
537 U.S. 1122
Published

537 U.S. 1122

THOMAS
v.
WATKINS, WARDEN, ET AL.

No. 02-7188.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 13, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 44 Fed. Appx. 302.