green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gettys
See State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 549-50, 565 S.E.2d 609 , 638 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 123 S.Ct. 894 , 154 L.Ed.2d 808 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mabrey
See State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 565 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 646 (2002) (noting that although defendant objected to certain evidence as inadmissible pursuant to Rule 608 and as inadmissible hearsay, he did not object on those specific grounds at trial, and thus, “defendant did not preserve these specific arguments for appellate review.”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sanchez
See State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 534 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 629 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
IN THE MATTER OF SE
See State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 556, 565 S.E.2d 609 , 641-42 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Abdullah
App. P. 10(b)(1); see State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 528, 565 S.E.2d 609 , 625 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. MacK
See State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 534 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 629 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Finney
See State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 565 S.E.2d 609 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Whitman
See also State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 542 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 633 (2002) (open-file discovery provided defendant with all information necessary “to adequately prepare or conduct his defense”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bunn
Ed. 2d 122 ; see also State v. Morgan, 359 N.C. 131, 161 , 604 S.E.2d 886, 904 (2004); State v. Butler, 356 N.C. 141, 145 , 567 S.E.2d 137, 139 (2002). “ ‘Substantial evidence’ is relevant evidence that a reasonable person might accept as adequate, or would consider necessary to support a particular conclusion.” Garcia, 358 N.C. at 412 , 597 S.E.2d at 746 (citations omitted); see also State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 578-79 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 654 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McNeil
Ed. 2d 122 (2005); see also State v. Morgan, 359 N.C. 131, 161 , 604 S.E.2d 886, 904 (2004); State v. Butler, 356 N.C. 141, 145 , 567 S.E.2d 137, 139 (2002). “ ‘Substantial evidence’ is relevant evidence that a reasonable person might accept as adequate, or would consider necessary to support a particular conclusion.” Garcia, 358 N.C. at 412 , 597 S.E.2d at 746 (citations omitted); see also State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 578-79 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 654 (2002) (quoting State v. Vick, 341 N.C. 569, 583-84 , 461 S.E.2d 655, 663 (1995)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Braxton
Stat. § 14-27.4 (a)(2) (2003); see also State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 581, 565 S.E.2d 609 , 655 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tirado
See, e.g., State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 588, 565 S.E.2d 609 , 659 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 123 S.Ct. 894 , 154 L.Ed.2d 808 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tirado
See, e.g., State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 588 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 659 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Garcia
(2×)
However, the problem then, as now, is that when a felony-murder defendant moves for a bill of particulars concerning the alleged underlying crime, his motion is subject to the discretion of the trial judge, see State v. Covington, 290 N.C. 313, 343 , 226 S.E.2d 629, 649 (1976), and is not subject to review except for palpable and gross abuse of discretion, State v. Swift, 290 N.C. 383, 391 , 226 S.E.2d 652, 660 (1976); see also State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 542 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 633 (holding that a "`denial of a defendant's motion for a bill of particulars will be held error only when it cl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501, 553-54 , 565 S.E.2d 609, 640 (2002) (recognizing the admissibility of DNA evidence and upholding its use as the basis of an opinion by a properly qualified expert in forensic DNA analysis), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1125 , 123 S.Ct. 894 , 154 L.Ed.2d 808 (2003); Goode, 341 N.C. at 530-31 , 461 S.E.2d at 641-42 (reliability of bloodstain pattern interpretation supported in part by prior appellate acceptance of such technique in North Carolina and other jurisdictions); State v. Barnes, 333 N.C. 666, 680 , 430 S.E.2d 223, 231 (1993) (recognizing the long-e…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carter
See, e.g., State v. Williams, 355 N.C. 501 , 565 S.E.2d 609 (2002), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 154 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
Lakeside Dental Care
v.
Lakeside Dental Care
02-7293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
Cited by 53 opinions | Published
BROWN
v.
LAKESIDE DENTAL CARE.
No. 02-7293.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 13, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 45 Fed. Appx. 325.