green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casey Scott Patten
See United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222, 1228 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1176 , 123 S.Ct. 1006 , 154 L.Ed.2d 921 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casey Scott Patten
See United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222, 1228 (11th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1176 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Payne
See generally United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222,1232-36 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1176 , 123 S.Ct. 1006 , 154 L.Ed.2d 921 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(HC) McCarty v. Kernan
Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 396, 400-02 (1993); see also Indiana 20 v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164, 178 (2008) (“the Constitution permits states to insist upon 21 representation by counsel for those competent enough to stand trial ... but who still suffer from 22 severe mental illness to the point where they are not competent to conduct trial proceedings by 23 themselves”). 24 Moreover, a trial court may refuse to allow a defendant to represent himself or herself if 25 the defendant is not “able and willing to abide by the rules of procedure and courtroom protocol.” 26 See United States …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DeSimone
Compare United States v. Bishop, 291 F.3d 1100, 1106-08 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1176 , 123 S.Ct. 1002 , 154 L.Ed.2d 920 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fuller
See, e.g., United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1176 , 123 S.Ct. 1006 , 154 L.Ed.2d 921 (2003); United States v. Farner, 251 F.3d 510 (5th Cir.2001); United States v. Miller, 102 F.Supp.2d 946, 948 (N.D.Ill.2000). 6 Finally, defendant seems to argue that the government failed to prove the interstate commerce element of the offense because telephone calls to internet service providers (ISP) made within the caller’s local calling area are “local calls” for reciprocal compensation arrangements under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bishop
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-7810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 2003.
Published
BISHOP
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-7810.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 27, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 291 F. 3d 1100.