green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Elwood v. Morin
where a party does not ask the district court for leave to amend, the request on appeal to remand with instructions to permit amendment comes too late
discussed
Cited "see"
Elwood v. Drescher
See Ventura Packers, Inc. v. F/V Jeanine Kathleen, 305 F.3d 913 , 917 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (declining to address a request for leave to amend made for the first time on appeal), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1000 , 123 S.Ct. 1910 155 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003); Alaska v. United States, 201 F.3d 1154, 1163-64 (9th Cir.2000) (“Where a party does not ask the district court for leave to amend, the request [on appeal] to remand with instructions to permit amendment comes too late.”) (alteration in original) (quotations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elwood v. Morin
See Ventura Packers, Inc. v. F/V Jeanine Kathleen, 305 F.3d 913 , 917 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (declining to address a request for leave to amend made for the first time on appeal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1910 , 155 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003); Alaska v. United States, 201 F.3d 1154, 1163-64 (9th Cir.2000) (“Where a party does not ask the district court for leave to amend, the request on appeal to remand with instructions to permit amendment comes too late.”) (quotations and alteration omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Advanced Communication Design, Inc.
v.
Premier Retail Networks, Inc
v.
Premier Retail Networks, Inc
02-1254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 2003.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
ADVANCED COMMUNICATION DESIGN, INC.
v.
PREMIER RETAIL NETWORKS, INC.
No. 02-1254.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 28, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 46 Fed. Appx. 964.