green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Parker v. Glosson
(2×)
Therefore, the majority holding is actually contained in Judge Whichard's "concurrence." See, e.g., Maraman v. Cooper Steel Fabricators, 355 N.C. 482, 483 , 562 S.E.2d 420, 421 (2002) (affirming the Court of Appeals' opinion in part and reversing the Court of Appeals' opinion in part because "a portion of the majority opinion was erroneously designated a dissent, while a portion of the dissent was found in what purported to be the majority opinion"); Jones v. Asheville Radiological Group, P.A., 350 N.C. 654, 655 , 517 S.E.2d 380, 380 (1999) (remanding for modification of the Court of Appeals' …
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Bauberger
(4×)
See Lindsey, 355 N.C. at 487, 562 S.E.2d at 420 (adopting the dissent in Lindsey , 147 N.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ralph LINDSEY, Jr.
v.
BODDIE-NOELL ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Hardee's Skat-Thru.
v.
BODDIE-NOELL ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Hardee's Skat-Thru.
679A01.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 10, 2002.
Per Curiam.
Published
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. by L.P. McLendon, Jr., Greensboro; John W. Ormand III, Raleigh; and Teresa DeLoatch Bryant, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.
Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P. by H. Lee Evans, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.
REVERSED.