Tilli v. Smith, 539 U.S. 901 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Tilli v. Smith, 539 U.S. 901 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service (ca9, 2011-04-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan, 266 F.3d 1130, 1138 (9th Cir.2001), cert. granted and opinion vacated on other grounds, 539 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 2267 , 156 L.Ed.2d 109 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA v. US Forest Service
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan, 266 F.3d 1130, 1138 (9th Cir.2001), cert. granted and opinion vacated on other grounds, 539 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 2267 , 156 L.Ed.2d 109 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Lamb v. Missouri Department of Corrections
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moore v. Plaster, 313 F.3d 442, 444 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam), cert. dismissed, 539 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 2254 , 156 L.Ed.2d 109 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Lamantia v. Voluntary Plan Administrators
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan, 266 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir.2001), vacated, 539 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 2267 , 156 L.Ed.2d 109 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Lamantia v. Voluntary Plan Administrator, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan, 266 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir.2001), vacated, 539 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 2267 , 156 L.Ed.2d 109 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tilli
v.
Smith
02-9969.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 2003.
539 U.S. 901
Published

Super. Ct. Pa. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.