Roark v. Humana, Inc., 539 U.S. 986 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Roark v. Humana, Inc., 539 U.S. 986 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Loving v. United States (armfor, 2006-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Loving v. United States
C.A.A.F. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Towery, 204 Ariz. 386, 390-91 , 64 P.3d 828, 832-33 , cert. dism’d, 539 U.S. 986 , 124 S.Ct. 44 , 156 L.Ed.2d 702 (2003) 49 As a predicate for discussing the possible retroactive application of Ring under the second exception of Teague , the Supreme Court further explained why Ring was a new procedural rule stating: Ring’s holding is properly classified as procedural.
discussed Cited "see" Hughes v. State
Fla. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Towery, 204 Ariz. 386 , 64 P.3d 828, 835 (2003) (using the Linkletter elements to hold that Ring did not apply retroactively and noting that "[i]f the basic right to a jury trial *843 does not apply retroactively, then a right to a jury determination of aggravating circumstances that function essentially as elements of a greater offense also does not apply retroactively"), cert. dismissed, 539 U.S. 986 , 124 S.Ct. 44 , 156 L.Ed.2d 702 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Garcia
N.C. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hunt, 357 N.C. 257 , 582 S.E.2d 593 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 44 , 156 L.Ed.2d 702 (2003); see also State v. Mitchell, 353 N.C. 309, 328-29 , 543 S.E.2d 830, 842 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1000 , 122 S.Ct. 475 , 151 L.Ed.2d 389 (2001); State v. Davis, 353 N.C. 1, 44-45 , 539 S.E.2d 243, 271 (2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 839 , 122 S.Ct. 95 , 151 L.Ed.2d 55 (2001); State v. Braxton, 352 N.C. 158, 173-75 , 531 S.E.2d 428, 436-38 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1130 , 121 S.Ct. 890 , 148 L.Ed.2d 797 (2001); State v. Wallace, 351 N.C. 481, 504-08 , 528 S.E.2d 326, 341-43 , …
cited Cited "see" State v. Pope
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hunt, 357 N.C. 257 , 582 S.E.2d 593 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 44 , 156 L.Ed.2d 702 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" McGowin v. Manpower International, Inc.
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roark v. Humana, Inc., 307 F.3d 298, 313 (5th Cir.2002) (stating that a federal court may assert supplemental jurisdiction only over claims preempted by ERISA § 514), cert. dism’d, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 44 , 156 L.Ed.2d 702 , and cert. granted sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. McNeill
N.C. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Grooms , 353 N.C. 50 , 84-86, 540 S.E.2d 713 , 734-35 (2000) (holding that when the defendant and his counsel had reached an absolute impasse, the trial court properly ordered defense counsel to defer to defendant's wishes not to present **263 mitigating evidence and that this ruling did not deprive the defendant of effective assistance of counsel), 15 cert. denied , *838 534 U.S. 838 , 122 S.Ct. 93 , 151 L.Ed.2d 54 (2001) ; State v. Payne , 337 N.C. 505 , 533, 448 S.E.2d 93 , 109 (1994) (finding no error in a sentencing instruction that "allowed the jury to decide that a non-stat…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roark
v.
Humana, Inc., Et Al.
02-1826.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 18, 2003.
539 U.S. 986
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.