green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Henry D.
"When a party has impeached a witness with portions of a statement that are inconsistent with his or her trial testimony, the trial court may, in its sound discretion, admit the entire statement for rehabilitative purposes, in order to place the allegedly inconsistent statement into context and to prevent the jury from being misled. " (Emphasis added.) State v. Hines , supra, 243 Conn. at 807 -808 , 709 A.2d 522 ; see also State v. Efrain M. , supra, 95 Conn.App. at 599 -600 , 899 A.2d 50 ; but see State v. Moody , 77 Conn.App. 197 , 207-208, 822 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 918 , 827 A.…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ingram
See State v. Moody, 77 Conn. App. 197, 217 , 822 A.2d 990 (use of pronoun “I” in argument increases chances that arguments will deteriorate into expressions of personal opinion, but mere use of the pronoun “I” does not constitute improper argument), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 918 , 827 A.2d 707 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1058 , 124 S. Ct. 831 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dawes
See State v. Moody, 77 Conn. App. 197, 217 , 822 A.2d 990 (use of pronoun “I” in argument increases chances that appropriately structured arguments will deteriorate into expressions of personal opinion), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 918 , 827 A.2d 707 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1058 , 124 S. Ct. 831 , 157 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Felix R.
I submit, ladies and gentlemen, he was trying to deceive and deflect the investigation of this case from the very beginning.’’ (Emphasis added.) 2 See State v. Ceballos, 266 Conn. 364, 367 , 832 A.2d 14 (2003) (reversing judgment on due process grounds due to improper conduct by Pepper during questioning of witnesses and closing argument); State v. Payne, 260 Conn. 446 , 447–49, 797 A.2d 1088 (2002) (reversing judgment under supervisory authority due to improper comments by Pepper during closing argument); State v. Butler, 255 Conn. 828 , 829–30, 769 A.2d 697 (2001) (affirming Appel- l…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jackson, AKA Jackson-El
v.
Hamlin
v.
Hamlin
03-6695.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 2003.
Published
JACKSON, AKA JACKSON-EL
v.
HAMLIN ET AL.
No. 03-6695.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 1, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 131.