Singh v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc, 540 U.S. 1073 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Singh v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc, 540 U.S. 1073 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (38 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Antrim (ca1, 2004-11-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Antrim
1st Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sargent, 319 F.3d 4, 8 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 920 , 157 L.Ed.2d 742 (2003). 2 The common-law “knoek-and-announce” rule is designed to (i) protect whatever privacy interests the occupants may have in the residence, (ii) permit the occupants voluntarily to open the door so as to avoid damage to the property in the course of a forcible entry by the police and (iii) prevent occupants from initiating defensive measures against the police in a mistaken belief that the person attempting entry may be an unlawful intruder.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royster v. Gahler
D. Maryland · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., King v. Rumsfeld, 328 F.3d 145, 151 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 922 , 157 L.Ed.2d 742 (2003); see Carter v. Ball, 33 F.3d 450, 460 (4th Cir.1994); Bickford v. Denmark Tech.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert L. Bolden
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Ortiz, 315 F.3d 873, 896-97 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bolden (2×)
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Ortiz, 315 F.3d 873, 896-97 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lamanna v. Special Agents Mutual Benefits Ass'n
W.D. Pa. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
REMEDY ERISA provides discretion in identifying “appropriate equitable relief’ where the court has determined that the plan administrator acted arbitrarily or capriciously. 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(3); see also Carney v. IBEW Local Union 98 Pension Fund, 66 Fed.Appx. 381 , 387 n. 2 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 924 , 157 L.Ed.2d 743 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." PRO-TECH WELDING AND FABRICATION INC. v. Lajuett
W.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 388-91 , 116 S.Ct. 1384 , 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996); see also Apex Inc. v. Raritan Computer, Inc., 325 F.3d 1364, 1370 (Fed.Cir.) (“claim construction ... is a question of law”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 922 , 157 L.Ed.2d 742 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Singh
v.
Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc
03-478.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 2003.
540 U.S. 1073
Published

540 U.S. 1073

SINGH
v.
PRUDENTIAL HEALTH CARE PLAN, INC.

No. 03-478.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 8, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 4th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 335 F. 3d 278.