discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Cleveland See e.g., Commonwealth v. Marinelli, 547 Pa. 294 , 690 A.2d 203, 217 (1997) (‘While the presence of blood on the victim depicted in the photographs is unpleasant, it is not in and of itself inflammatory.’); Rush, at 559-60 (pictures of victim’s body at crime scene were admissible despite medical examiner’s testimony); Commonwealth v. Gorby, 527 Pa. 98 , 588 A.2d 902, 908 (1991) (no abuse of discretion in allowing photographs ‘which depicted a large gaping gash on the victim’s neck as well as 13 other knife wounds located on the victim’s hands, arms, back, and chest’); Commonwea…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Orme v. State See, e.g., Armstrong v. State, 862 So.2d 705, 720 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2161 , 158 L.Ed.2d 757 (2004).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Malloy See Commonwealth v. Begley, 566 Pa. 239 , 780 A.2d 605, 622-23 (2001) (“even where the body’s condition can be described through testimony from a medical examiner, such testimony does not obviate the admissibility of photographs”) (quoting Commonwealth v. Jacobs, 536 Pa. 402 , 639 A.2d 786, 789 (1994)); see also Commonwealth v. Tharp, 574 Pa. 202 , 830 A.2d 519, 531-32 (2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2161 , 158 L.Ed.2d 736 (2004) (introduction of photographs was proper even though testimonial evidence to demonstrate injuries was available).