green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cox v. Steffes
(2×)
The Supreme Court’s per curiam decision simply stated “[a]ffirmed” without specifying which opinion was the basis for that affirmance. 354 N.C. at 570, 557 S.E.2d at 530.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brenda HENRY and Foster Henry, Individually, and Brenda Henry, as Guardian Ad Litem for Crystal Henry
v.
SOUTHEASTERN OB-GYN ASSOCIATES, P.A., James L. Price, M.D, and Laif Lofgren, M.D.
v.
SOUTHEASTERN OB-GYN ASSOCIATES, P.A., James L. Price, M.D, and Laif Lofgren, M.D.
507A01.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2001.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Walker, Clark, Allen, Herrin & Morano L.L.P., by Robert D. Walker, Jr., and O. Drew Grice, Jr., Goldsboro, for defendant-appellees.
Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, P.A, by Adam Stein, Chapel Hill, on behalf of the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.