green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cuevas
See State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158, 161-62 , 82 P3d 593 (2003) (describing sentencing guideline rules), vac’d and rem’d on other grounds, Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cuevas
(2×)
See State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158, 161-62 , 82 P3d 593 (2003) (describing sentencing guideline rules), vac’d and rent’d on other grounds, Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
New York State Psychiatric Ass'n v. Unitedhealth Group
See Cicio v. Does, 321 F.3d 83, 95-96 (2d Cir.2003), vacated on other grounds, 542 U.S. 933 , 124 S.Ct. 2902 , 159 L.Ed.2d 808 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. LOPEZ-DANIEL
See Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Dretke
(2×)
See Nelson v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 934 , 124 S.Ct. 2905 , 159 L.Ed.2d 808 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Quarterman
(2×)
See Nelson v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 934 , 124 S.Ct. 2905 , 159 L.Ed.2d 808 (2004). 24 The light shed by the Supreme Court's holding in Tennard includes the following: (1) The Fifth Circuit's threshold "constitutional relevance" tests have no foundation in the Supreme Court's decisions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davilla
See State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009) (explaining statutory construction methodology); see also State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158, 162 , 82 P3d 593 (2003), vac’d and rent’d sub nom Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004) (sentencing guidelines “have the authority of statutory law”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Costa v. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
See, e.g., Enigma, 994 F.Supp.2d at 302 , 2014 WL 297269, at *10 (“The Second Circuit has held that state common law claims of fraudulent misrepresentation are preempted by ERISA if the false representation concerns the existence, terms, or benefits of an ERISA plan.”) (citing Cicio v. Does 1-8, 321 F.3d 83, 96 (2d Cir.2003), vacated on other grounds sub nom., Vytra Healthcare v. Cicio, 542 U.S. 933 , 124 S.Ct. 2902 , 159 L.Ed.2d 808 (2004)); Shearon v. Comfort Tech Mech.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lafferty
See also Dilts v. Oregon, 542 U.S. 934 , 124 S.Ct. 2906 , 159 L.Ed.2d 809 (2004) (applying Blakely to the Oregon sentencing guidelines).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lafferty
See also Dilts v. Oregon, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004) (applying Blakely to the Oregon sentencing guidelines).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ice
(2×)
Compare State v. Dilts, 336 Or 158 , 82 P3d 593 (2003), vac’d and rem’d, 542 US 934 , 124 S Ct 2906 , 159 L Ed 2d 809 (2004) (holding that Apprendi did not apply to departure sentences), with State v. Dilts, 337 Or 645 , 103 P3d 95 (2004) (holding, on remand in light of Blakely, that Apprendi applies to departure sentences).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nelson
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-8659.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
Cited by 22 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Tennard v. Dretke, ante, p. 274.