green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“no authority has been brought to our attention that holds as a matter of federal takings law that trees are a separate property interest before they are severed from their 350 underlying land.”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Forestry
no authority has been brought to our attention that holds as a matter of federal takings law that trees are a separate property interest before they are severed from their 350 underlying land.
examined
Cited "see"
Technology Recycling Corp. v. City of Taylor
(3×)
See Wittman v. Wilson, 95 F. App’x 752, 754 (6th Cir.) (“[T]he existence of prejudice is clear because he undermined defendants’ ability to defend this case.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 873 (2004); accord Adams v. Trs. of the N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry
See Seiber v. United States, 364 F3d 1356, 1366-67 (Fed Cir), cert den, 543 US 873 (2004) (so holding); Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States, 296 F3d 1339, 1352-57 (Fed Cir 2002), cert den, 538 US 906 (2003) (same); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 164 Or App 114, 125-26 , 991 P2d 563 (1999), rev den, 331 Or 244 (2000) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
W. R. Huff Asset Management Co., L. L. C.
v.
Bt Securities Corp.
v.
Bt Securities Corp.
04-91.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
W. R. HUFF ASSET MANAGEMENT CO., L. L. C.
v.
BT SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.
No. 04-91.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 891 So. 2d 310.