State v. Angle, 720 P.2d 79 (Ariz. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Angle, 720 P.2d 79 (Ariz. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Williams (arizctapp, 2023-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Williams
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
State v. Miranda, 200 Ariz. 67, 68, ¶ 3 (2001); State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 (1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Dodd
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
See State v. Miranda, 200 Ariz. 67, 68, ¶ 3 (2001); State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 (1986). ¶10 A trial court is required to instruct only on “necessarily included offenses.” See State v. Wall, 212 Ariz. 1, 3 , ¶¶ 13–14 (2006); Ariz. R.
examined Cited as authority (rule) State v. Erivez (3×) also: Cited "see"
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
State v. Miranda, 200 Ariz. 67, 68, ¶ 3 , 22 P.3d 506, 507 (2001); State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 , 720 P.2d 79, 80 (1986); State v. Foster, 191 Ariz. 355, 357, ¶ 9 , 955 P.2d 993, 995 (App.1998).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Estrada-Resendiz (2×)
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 499, 504 , 1 Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated. 2 STATE v. ESTRADA-RESENDIZ Decision of the Court 720 P.2d 100, 105 (App. 1985), vacated in other part by State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 , 720 P.2d 79, 80 (1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Miranda (2×)
Ariz. · 2001 · confidence medium
I. ¶ 2 This court addressed the issue of whether a jury can be instructed on disorderly conduct as a lesser-included offense of aggravated assault in State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 , 720 P.2d 79, 80 (1986).
examined Cited as authority (rule) State v. Miranda (4×) also: Cited "see"
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Our supreme court concluded in Angle that a person who commits aggravated assault under section 13-1204(A)(2) necessarily commits disorderly conduct under section 13-2904(A)(6), reasoning “that as a matter of common sense it is impossible to put a person in reasonable apprehension of imminent bodily injury without also disturbing that person’s peace or quiet.” Angle, 149 Ariz. at 508, 720 P.2d at 109 (Kleinschmidt, J., dissenting).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Harrison
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
Id. at 197, 677 P.2d at 1305.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Kamai (2×)
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1995 · confidence medium
State v. Scott, 177 Ariz. 131, 139 , 865 P.2d 792, 800 (1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 129 , 130 L.Ed.2d 73 (1994); State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 478-79 , 720 P.2d 79, 79-80 (1986); Kinkade, 147 Ariz. at 253 , 709 P.2d at 887 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Garcia
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1993 · confidence medium
State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 499, 508 , 720 P.2d 100, 109 (App.1985) (Kleinschmidt, J., dissenting), opinion vacated in part, dissent adopted in part, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 , 720 P.2d 79, 80 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" A.G. Ex Rel. Grundemann v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69 (2×)
9th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 499 , 720 P.2d 100, 105 (Ariz.Ct.App.1985), affirmed in part, vacated in part on other grounds, 149 Ariz. 478 , 720 P.2d 79 (1986). 11 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Multari (2×)
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 499, 504 , 720 P.2d 100, 105 (App. 1985), vacated in other part, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 , 720 P.2d 79, 80 (1986). ¶10 R.C. testified he was so frightened by Multari’s conduct that he drove away “as fast as [he] could” and called 9-1-1.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pino (2×)
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 478, 479 , 720 P.2d 79, 80 (1986) (Disorderly conduct under A.R.S. § 13-2904(A)(6) constitutes a lesser-included offense of aggravated assault under A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(2).); State v. Miranda, 198 Ariz. 426, 429, ¶ 13 , 10 P.3d 1213, 1216 (App. 2000) (“[D]isorderly conduct under section 13-2904(A)(6) is a lesser- included offense of aggravated assault under section 13-1204(A)(2).”).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Foster (2×)
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sanders at 290-91 , 564 P.2d at 1257-58 . ¶ 8 Each party cites State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 499, 507 , 720 P.2d 100, 108 (App. 1985) (Kleinschmidt, J., dissenting), adopted by 149 Ariz. 478 , 720 P.2d 79 (1986), for support.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Arizona, Appellee,
v.
Harold Arthur ANGLE, Appellant
CR-86-0039-PR, 1 CA-CR 8506.
Arizona Supreme Court.
May 19, 1986.
720 P.2d 79
Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen., William J. Schafer, III, Chief Counsel, Crim. Div., Barbara M. Jarrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee., Chester R. Lockwood, Jr., Prescott, for . appellant.
Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman.
Cited by 25 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.

The single issue for review in this case is whether disorderly conduct, A.R.S. § 13-2904(A)(6) constitutes a lesser included offense of aggravated assault, A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6 § 5(3) and Ariz.R. Crim.P. 31.19.

Defendant, Harold Arthur Angle, was charged with three counts of aggravated assault while armed with a deadly weapon in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1203(A)(2), 13-1204(A)(2). The trial court gave jury instructions on aggravated assault and attempted aggravated assault. However, the trial court refused defendant’s requested instruction on disorderly conduct by reckless display of a firearm in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(6). The jury convicted defendant of three counts of attempted aggravated assault and he was sentenced to concurrent presumptive terms of six years imprisonment.

Defendant appealed his conviction and sentence and the court of appeals affirmed. State v. Angle, 149 Ariz. 499, 720 P.2d 100 (1985). We adopt the dissenting opinion of Judge Kleinschmidt and vacate the majority opinion as to this issue. We agree with the result of the majority as to all other issues.

Remanded for new trial.

CAMERON and FELDMAN, JJ., concur.

Dissent

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice,

dissenting.

Since the ruling of the trial court and the opinion of the majority of the Court of Appeals appears to me to be correct, I would affirm the judgment of the superior[*480] court. Therefore, I dissent from the position of the majority.

Concurrence

HAYS, Justice.

I concur in Chief Justice Holohan’s dissent.